Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
Isn't the mathematical problem the fact that the necessary mass can't be found so, to keep the equations balanced, we must posit some mysterious, unseen mass (or energy) to balance the equation?

If what we see now demands that a process is in progress then we must explain our rationalizations or admit to a cyclical phenomenon which we are only allowed to witness; it is this nasty beginning bit that we can't get past.

73 posted on 09/27/2003 1:29:29 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Old Professer
Thank you so much for your post!

Indeed, Einstein first proposed the cosmological constant and then ditched it because he felt it was 'kluged.'

But recently, scientists have brought the factor back into the equations because it was discovered that the universe is accelerating. Originally, the term dark energy was used interchangeably with dark matter. But now, they are defined separately. Dark matter has positive gravity - black holes and massive neutrinos (if any) whereas dark energy has negative gravity and thus, causes acceleration.

AIP 651: The Big Rip

AIP 479: Dark Energy and the Microwave Background


81 posted on 09/27/2003 1:48:03 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson