To: fqued
You can argue all you want to that Arnold's baby steps rightward--the ones forced by Tom and his supporter's refusal to surrender to the liberals--mean anything. He has no credibility.
His record of statements and actions as a liberal are too many to ignore and gloss over with oh-so-conveneint heat-of-the-campaign last minute rhetoric.
170 posted on
09/25/2003 4:45:29 PM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(Call upon God to move on our behalf...)
To: EternalVigilance
you wrote: You can argue all you want to that Arnold's baby steps rightward--the ones forced by Tom and his supporter's refusal to surrender to the liberals--mean anything. He has no credibility.
Please translate. . . I am not certain I have any idea what you are saying.
Oh, and I NEVER said that Arny was on the right, and I also never said that I supported him or his views. I was arguing for FAIRNESS about what he says and believes, and against calling him a liberal or RINO. He certainly ain't a conservative, but he also ain't no liberal, either.
186 posted on
09/25/2003 4:52:26 PM PDT by
fqued
(facts are nasty little things, but that doesn't mean we should squash them)
To: EternalVigilance
Hey EVie, he's what we got and we like him!
323 posted on
09/25/2003 7:56:30 PM PDT by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson