Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California recall: Does one man hold key? [McClintock]
Christian Science Monitor ^ | 9-25 | Christian Science Monitor

Posted on 09/25/2003 2:54:50 PM PDT by ambrose

The Christian Science Monitor - csmonitor.com

from the September 26, 2003 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0926/p01s03-uspo.html

California recall: Does one man hold key?

Tom McClintock, top GOP conservative, could tilt race for or against Arnold Schwarzenegger.

By Daniel B. Wood | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

BURBANK, CALIF. - Republican candidate Tom McClintock laughs from deep in the belly when asked if he will be the "spoiler" in the great populist revolution/experiment/circus of California's gubernatorial recall election.

"My opponents say I'm the Ross Perot of this campaign, possibly siphoning off enough votes to hand the election to Democrats," he says, settling onto a shady park bench for an interview. "I say, 'Wait a minute.... Ross Perot was an idle millionaire, with no public-policy experience who one day on a whim entered the presidential race.' That sounds like another candidate in this race ... not me," he says, referring to muscleman/millionaire Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Once a mere asterisk in the con- fused calculus of California's 135-candidate recall election, Mr. McClintock has gradually emerged as the strong, third-place vote getter in polls - rising (at 14-to-18 points) while the two leaders - fellow Republican Schwarzenegger (26 points) and Democratic Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante (28 points) - tread water.

As the race enters its final stretch, McClintock's motives and acts are becoming paramount for two reasons. One, splitting the Republican vote, he could cost the party its best chance in a decade of high, statewide office. Two, his candidacy could drag down the success of the recall itself by forcing Republican partisans to reconsider driving Gov. Gray Davis from office because of fear that they could hand the office to a more liberal Democrat, Mr. Bustamante.

Ever since McClintock leaped from 4 percent voter support to double-digits about three weeks ago, the pressure has risen for him to stop offering himself as an alternative to Arnold Schwarzen-egger that could hand the election to Democrats. But as more voters get to know him, his poll numbers have continued to rise, while Schwarzenegger's are flat.

More conservative than Schwarzenegger on social issues - abortion, gay marriage, gun control - he is also far more experienced in fiscal matters, with California's sagging economy the No. 1 issue.

"He is by far the most studied and experienced of all the candidates in fiscal issues and how to implement public policy," says Jack Pitney, political scientist at Claremont McKenna College. "If the election were a college SAT test, McClintock would be the next governor hands down."

Even though he is widely acknowledged as the more knowledgeable, the more articulate, and the more detailed idea-man, 25-year government veteran McClintock does not have the millions of dollars of his chief Republican rival, nor his name recognition. Therein lies one of the chief ironies of the recall: Does he/should he/will he step aside to allow the neophyte challenger - and the Republican party - to gain its best chance of victory?

"He is a man who stands on his word and his principles while claiming time and again that he is in this to the last," says Doug Jeffe, a longtime California political consultant. "If he did get out, it would be totally uncharacteristic of him."

Now, with Schwarzenegger and Bustamante in a near dead heat, one leading Republican, Darrell Issa, the millionaire who bankrolled the signature gathering to oust Davis, has said that if Schwarzenegger or McClintock don't back off, Republicans should vote "no" on the recall. Polls show that if Arnold backed out, McClintock could not win.

But McClintock rejects a widespread analysis that conservative candidates have brought Republican fortunes to their low ebb. He feels the current crisis is the perfect storm for their historic comeback.

"Great parties are built on great principles," says McClintock, referring to the pillars of conservative policy: holding down taxes, cutting waste, standing up for the unborn, and resisting government approval of gay unions. "This is not a time to change our principles."

While such comments win kudos from some for adherence to principle, they strike others as bullheaded.

"McClintock's constant megaphoning of conservative social agendas is presenting a real problem for Republicans who really like him for his fiscal experience," says William Schneider, a pollster and political analyst. "They know Tom has the smarts to get this state out of economic problems and they worry about Arnold's lack of experience and specificity. But they don't think Tom can win and can't resist the fact that Arnold could."

As a child, McClintock campaigned for Barry Goldwater at age 8. In high school he organized classmates into a statewide GOP group. A political-science graduate of UCLA, he became a syndicated columnist railing about former Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown, lauding the character of John Wayne. Hired by a former L.A. police chief-cum-state senator (Ed Davis), McClintock began a 25-year career in Sacramento, marked by opposition to Republican governors George Deukmejian and Pete Wilson over tax hikes and spending waste.

Despite his conservative stances, he was the top GOP vote-getter in the state, running for controller, in the 2002 election.

"I got very little from the state GOP and was outspent by my opponent by 5 to 1," says McClintock. "Despite all that, I lost by less than 1 percent of the vote."

A man who often quotes Reagan and Shakespeare, McClintock is considered a legislative loner with few legislative friends for his near two-decade pursuit of shrinking the state payroll.

In his favorite stump speech he tells why cutting is so important. As a child, he came home from school to find his mother crying over an unexpectedly high tax bill. The moment has lived in his imagination ever since that government takes too much from citizens and delivers too little.

Full HTML version of this story which may include photos, graphics, and related links


www.csmonitor.com | Copyright © 2003 The Christian Science Monitor. All rights reserved.
For permission to reprint/republish this article, please email copyright@csps.com



TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 501-517 next last
To: Tamsey
Some of Arnold's support are from center voters that will NOT vote for a pro-life and anti-gay candidate.

Number one, McClintock is not "anti-gay". Denying people who engage in perverse, self-destructive behavior special rights because of their behavior is not anti-gay.

Number two, no quarter should be given by any Republican to someone who will vote against someone who is "pro-life". Anyone who is hell-bent upon murdering children or enabling that murder is not to be courted for their vote. We should not negotiate with terrorists or their like.

261 posted on 09/25/2003 6:31:11 PM PDT by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
Conservatives should be ferocious in stopping Hillary from gaining further power... even if it means cooperating as a coalition with the moderates in the GOP.

A moderate by any other name is still a liberal. We need leadership - conservative leadership - and people will follow. This pandering to the lowest common liberal denominator is selling the soul of the Republican party and leading our nation down the path to socialism in a hurry. The 'me-too' liberalism being portrayed as moderatism is not what the Party, the State of California, or the nation needs.

262 posted on 09/25/2003 6:34:34 PM PDT by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
The Jig is Up
263 posted on 09/25/2003 6:35:41 PM PDT by Afronaut (Never Support a Liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
if we all banded together and helped support the Republican frontrunner

Tam, I don't see FR EVER all "banding together" on any issue. We have too many disruptors imbedded here, masquerading as Republicans. Unless they leave when Arnold wins, who knows what they can do for the 2004 campaign.

264 posted on 09/25/2003 6:37:14 PM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
Tam, I don't see FR EVER all "banding together" on any issue. We have too many disruptors imbedded here, masquerading as Republicans. Unless they leave when Arnold wins, who knows what they can do for the 2004 campaign.

Yes, the liberal shills supporting the campaign of a Hollywood liberal - a Kennedy, no less - have been quite shrill on FR of late. I suspect they'll crawl back into their cesspools until the 2004 campaign rolls around and they have some other liberal to promote.

265 posted on 09/25/2003 6:39:29 PM PDT by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

266 posted on 09/25/2003 6:40:44 PM PDT by annyokie (Proud member of EggsAcktley's "posse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut
He could have showcased a bigger fish.
267 posted on 09/25/2003 6:40:53 PM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
No, there you're wrong, disruptor. I'm a Bush fan all the way. Now, go away. I'm logging off, so don't bother. Hasta la Vista, baby.
268 posted on 09/25/2003 6:41:13 PM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
Heheheh. Thank you, anny dear. Seems like the ping posse is very unpopular today. We don't have to actually SAY or DO anything; the ping does it all. LOL!
269 posted on 09/25/2003 6:44:08 PM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
You must be really upset now! Weren't you supposed to be some sort of big shot? Didn't you have some insight?
270 posted on 09/25/2003 6:45:11 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
The kind of stuff that used to get pretty much unanimous support on this web site. Alas...no longer.

Amen......We don't elect conservatives, because the party hacks do not run conservative candidates.

271 posted on 09/25/2003 6:45:38 PM PDT by itsahoot (The lesser of two evils, is evil still...Alan Keyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

272 posted on 09/25/2003 6:47:47 PM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: annyokie


273 posted on 09/25/2003 6:48:05 PM PDT by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
And I have yet to see you on a recall thread where you haven't made a venomous personal attack on a fellow Freeper for simply having the temerity of supporting the only pro-life candidate in this race. Amazing.

Boy you are in trouble now [:~)
Great observation too.

274 posted on 09/25/2003 6:48:22 PM PDT by itsahoot (The lesser of two evils, is evil still...Alan Keyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
Conservatives should be ferocious in stopping Hillary from gaining further power... even if it means cooperating as a coalition with the moderates in the GOP.


Not to worry about Hillary..... She'll soon be under control and not a thorn in anyones side again.....

You see Larry Klayman has announced he's running for Senator from FL in the Republican Primary and his main objective will be Hillary.... So we can now move on to other problems facing this country since ol' lar has Hillary under his wing......
275 posted on 09/25/2003 6:49:33 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
Tam, I don't see FR EVER all "banding together" on any issue.

I would think that if there was ANYTHING right-wingers could work together on it would be opposing Hillary Clinton... amazing :-(

276 posted on 09/25/2003 6:50:38 PM PDT by Tamzee ("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
He is arrogant, demeaning to others

Just how is he supposed to react when the first word out of every interviewers mouth is in effect

You miserable looser why don't you do the right thing and lay down for Arnold?

277 posted on 09/25/2003 6:50:46 PM PDT by itsahoot (The lesser of two evils, is evil still...Alan Keyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
You and your superdooperpooper uberprincipure perfectopatriot buddies better get that Third Party underway. Pronto. You've got 13 months till showtime.
278 posted on 09/25/2003 6:50:56 PM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
We win by seceding?!
279 posted on 09/25/2003 6:54:19 PM PDT by sixmil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Its not temerity that you display, its persistency in presenting negative posts, which seem divisive. The proof in the suggestion is that many people make this assertion. I for one.
280 posted on 09/25/2003 6:59:56 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 501-517 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson