Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Starwind
The statistic you cite moves parallel to the unemployment reported. Keep in mind also that "civilian work force" includes people not looking for a job, which is why it is not used as a base in the reporting of the main statistic.
85 posted on 09/25/2003 12:37:28 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: TopQuark
The statistic you cite moves parallel to the unemployment reported.

You evade. That would be the answer to the question "In what direction does the total unemployment/underemployment rate move"?, a question neither you nor I asked.

You have not addressed your reliance on only counting those receiving UI benefits as unemployed. How do you account for those who are looking for work, but receive no benefits? By what terminology do you designate them?

Keep in mind also that "civilian work force" includes people not looking for a job....

You are again mistaken. From the report:

The civilian labor force is the sum of employed and unemployed persons. People are classified as unemployed if they meet all of the following criteria: They had no employment during the reference week; they were available for work at that time; and they made specific efforts to find employment sometime during the 4-week period ending with the reference week.
Are you going to post a leading business media report of a mass factory hiring to show us what has been selectively ignored, or will you ignore that suggestion?
93 posted on 09/25/2003 12:50:31 PM PDT by Starwind (The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the only true good news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson