Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Canadian Outrage; Sandylapper
Yes, and Sandylapper has provided a refresher as to when we think Amber hired or begged the favor from this mystery P.I. whom she knew. WHO is he? Even if it's not King, WHAT can he tell us about Scott's habits during December?? I'm sure it would be very interesting!!

If only Laci had hired a private investigator... perhaps suspecting infidelity, and deciding to get a divorce, and wanting some evidence.... boy oh boy, that would give us a P.I. who had started finding stuff out even earlier!! What a bombshell witness that person would be!
487 posted on 10/05/2003 6:07:00 AM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies ]


To: Devil_Anse; MaggieMay; All
From post #450, by Maggie May.

But information from the wiretaps appears to have been of limited value to prosecutors. According to court documents, the district attorney's office had asked a judge to cut off the first wiretap early, saying "further progress in the investigation would not be gained through additional interception." State law allows a wiretap to run for up to 30 days, but a judge can grant an extension. Court documents show the first wiretap was approved on Jan. 10 and ran to Feb. 4, the day a car dealer gave Laci Peterson's Land Rover to her family. Scott Peterson had traded the vehicle in toward the purchase of the Dodge truck.

I don't get it. On Feb. 1, Amber talked to King under wiretap. That had to be BIG, especially if LE didn't know she was going to do it. Yet, they were ready to pull the plug because the intercepts were of such limited value to prosecutors.

490 posted on 10/05/2003 10:27:25 AM PDT by Sandylapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson