To: STOCKHRSE
"In fact, a person who is epistemologically savy might say: We know that they are dead;Also, where and when we found them: That the Husband was at a location near there four months earlier; the day Laci went missing: That the Husband volunteered that information or we probably would not know that."
Great point - I hope the prosecutors/police have evidence to answer these questions. If they don't I think the establishment of premeditation will be especially important. If they can do that I think the jurors may tolerate some uncertainty as to how, where, and when Laci died.
310 posted on
09/30/2003 4:14:32 PM PDT by
drjulie
To: All
What do you all make of Frank Muna these days? He seems pretty flaky and I can't see how anything he is doing is helping his client. I'm not an attorney so maybe I'm missing something!?!
311 posted on
09/30/2003 4:18:44 PM PDT by
drjulie
To: drjulie
Great point - I hope the prosecutors/police have evidence to answer these questions. If they don't I think the establishment of premeditation will be especially important. If they can do that I think the jurors may tolerate some uncertainty as to how, where, and when Laci died. Thats a tough one-Premeditation without physical connection will never get capital punishment,IMHO. This case will be overturned at least once, I think. LE has messed up in almost every phase of the investigation, From warrants to wire surveillance to venue(if they don't relocate this trial) to jurisdiction if she was killed outside Stanislaus county. Gotta think about all this!....;-0)
Ray
312 posted on
09/30/2003 4:57:15 PM PDT by
STOCKHRSE
( The preceding is this Freeper's opinion and is submitted rhetorically. .........)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson