Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Little Ray
My objection is to the Feds subsidizing the least competent and least productive segments of our population through various forms of welfare, while simultaneously making it difficult through taxation for more productive individuals to raise families.

Eugenicists always reveal their real motivations when they start applying words like "superior", "competent", and "productive" to classes of people (and you have used all three just in this thread!). Since a family of four who makes under $34,000 per year doesn't pay any federal taxes and is therefore taking in far more than they contribute, let's just sterilize everyone making less than that. They aren't "productive", right? That will leave more room in society for your kind of "productive" people.

Needless to say, when you subsidize something you get more of it: deliberately or otherwise, that is a eugenic process, and a pretty ugly one, too. I'd like to that reversed or, at least, neutralized.

Yeah, forget sterilization. It takes too long to see the results. Let's just round them up and put them in death camps.

29 posted on 09/25/2003 2:14:02 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Ronaldus Magnus
I'm not worried about 'em paying any taxes. I'm worried about net recipients of tax monies. You shouldn't be able to breed on the taxpayer's dime. If you can't feed 'em, don't breed 'em.
30 posted on 09/25/2003 2:18:16 PM PDT by Little Ray (When in trouble, when in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson