Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hank Kerchief
I'm sorry, I assumed that being was preferrable to non-being.
180 posted on 10/01/2003 11:19:04 AM PDT by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]


To: Pietro
I'm sorry, I assumed that being was preferrable to non-being

It is a common mistake. Nothing is, "just preferrable." It must be preferable for something, some end, or goal, or purpose. There is no such thing as an intrinsic value.

For example, why would one want to "be" in suffering for eternity, or "be" in boredom for eternity. It would be better in those cases not to be.

Hank

184 posted on 10/01/2003 12:08:14 PM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson