Replies

The sights were so disgusting, I never returned to the restaurant.

Aww, too bad. We'll make sure that only visually-approved people are allowed to be out in public.

Everyone else we'll lock away so as not to offend your delicate sensibilities.

34 posted on 09/24/2003 9:08:44 PM PDT by Chemist_Geek ("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)

To: Chemist_Geek

Aww, too bad. We'll make sure that only visually-approved people are allowed to be out in public.

Don't give the idiots on the left any ideas please! lol

83 posted on 09/25/2003 1:23:34 AM PDT by Fledermaus (While Bush doesn't usually please my conservative heart, no DimbulboRat can keep us safe!)

To: Chemist_Geek

"The sights were so disgusting, I never returned to the restaurant."

Your response:

Aww, too bad. We'll make sure that only visually-approved people are allowed to be out in public.

Everyone else we'll lock away so as not to offend your delicate sensibilities."

----------

Sheeeeesh, Chemist, what kind of remark is THAT?

WackyKat made a free decision to not go to a restaurant based on personal choice to not have to view disgusting behavior while eating.

WackyKat didn't try to have a law created that forbade those repulsive people going out, or make the restaurant change policy, or sue anyone for distress, or any other idiotic liberal response.

WackyKat used God given freedom to simply chose not to go there anymore.

So - what is your problem with THAT?

136 posted on 09/27/2003 6:24:47 AM PDT by HighWheeler

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794