Skip to comments.
Employment Disaster
The Daily Reckoning ^
| September 24, 2003
| Kurt Richebächer
Posted on 09/24/2003 5:09:34 PM PDT by Starwind
The Daily Reckoning PRESENTS: The strong, compelling evidence of an economy that is as far away from a recovery as its disastrous job numbers.
EMPLOYMENT DISASTER
By Kurt Richebächer
There has been much talk to the effect that America has just had its slightest recession in the whole postwar period. That is measured in real GDP growth, being bolstered by many statistical tricks. Measured, however, by job losses, which certainly are the far more important gauge, it is already America's worst recession by far.
In June it was declared that the recession had ended in November 2001. Yet in the 20 months since, payroll employment has declined by a total of about 1 million jobs, or about 8%. In not one of the seven or eight postwar recoveries has there been any employment decline. Immediate strong job growth has been the regular characteristic of all business cycle recoveries. On average, payroll jobs increased 3.8% in the 20 months following the end of recession.
What's more, no letup in job losses is in sight. During the second quarter, widely hailed for its better-than-expected GDP growth, the household measure of employment slumped by 260,000. However, this figure concealed an even greater number of workers - 556,000 - who statistically quit the workforce because they have given up looking for nonexisting jobs.
This rapidly growing group of people no longer count as unemployed. What American job statistics really measure are not changes in unemployment, but changes in job seekers. Including the frustrated job seekers, the U.S. unemployment rate is hardly lower than in Europe. Certainly, it is rising much faster.
In addition, the Labor Department is employing month for month the same two practices that camouflage the horrible reality. In July, for example, it reported a decline in payrolls by 44,000, while job losses for June were revised upward from 30,000 to 72,000. For May, the retrospective upward revision was even from 17,000 to 70,000. As such upward revisions of job losses in the prior month have become a regular feature, this practice has the convenient effect of producing correspondingly lower new numbers every month. The same happens, at more moderate scale, with weekly reported claims.
There is still more spinning involved. The government adds every month some 30,000-50,000 imaginary workers to the job total. It is based on the assumption that in an economic recovery a lot of people start their own business. In normal recoveries, they have done so, indeed.
All it needs to activate this statistical job creation is a unilateral decision by the government that the economy is in recovery. Once a year, the statisticians reconcile their assumption with reality by a revision. When they did this in May of this year, 400,000 new jobs that had been reported earlier simply vanished. Such revisions, of course, take place outside the monthly reported job losses. Together, we presume, these statistical casuistries have reduced the reported job losses in the past two years by well over 100,000 per month.
It rather abruptly became the consensus view that in America the great recovery from protracted, sluggish growth is finally on its way. Record-low interest rates, runaway money and credit growth, new big tax cuts, record-high cash-outs by consumers through mortgage refinancing, increasing house and stock prices, and rising profits are cited as the compelling reasons for this optimism.
We are more than skeptical about the true impact of all these influences on the economy primarily for one reason: Most of them, if not all of them, have been at work for some time already, but with grossly disappointing overall effects on the whole economy, and now some of these influences are weakening or even reversing.
Think of the sharp rise in long-term interest rates that is most assuredly stopping the mortgage-refinancing bubble dead in its tracks. That, in our view, will not only abort any recovery but will also mean the economy's relapse into new recession.
As for fiscal policy, it clearly gave its biggest boost to the economy between the fourth quarter of 2000 and the second quarter of 2002. That is a period of six quarters during which the federal budget gyrated from a quarterly surplus of $306.1 billion to a deficit of $526 billion, both at annual rate. This year, the deficit is supposed to hit $455 billion. Most probably, it will come out much higher. But this follows a deficit in the last year of $257.5 billion. The fiscal stimulus is waning, not increasing.
In any case, actual, historical experience in the 1970-80s with large-scale government deficit spending has been anything but encouraging. It created more inflation than economic growth. Over time, rising deficits were rather recognized as impediments to economic growth. Japan's recent experience makes frightening reading. Since 1997, government debt has skyrocketed from 92% to 150% of GDP, rising every year by more than 10% of GDP. Yet nominal GDP keeps shrinking.
As to monetary policy, we have very much the same doubts about its efficacy in generating economic growth under current economic and financial conditions. It is the traditional American consensus view that monetary policy is omnipotent if properly handled. In this view, any recession, or worse, always has its decisive cause in the failure of the central bank to ease its reins fast enough. In this view whatever happened in the economy during the prior boom is irrelevant.
This time, both monetary and fiscal policies in America have acted with unprecedented speed and vigor. To people's general surprise, the economy's rate of growth abruptly slumped during 2000 from 3.7% in the first half to 0.8% in the second.
Starting on Jan. 3, 2001, the Fed slashed its short-term rate in unusually quick succession. Within just 12 months, its federal funds rate was down from 5.98 to 1.82.
Assessing the development, the first thing that struck us as most unusual was that this sudden, sharp economic downturn occurred against the backdrop of most rampant money and credit growth. Total nonfederal, nonfinancial credit grew by $1,144.3 billion in 2000, after $1,102.6 billion in the year before. This compared with nominal GDP growth during the year by $437.2 billion. The first important conclusion to draw therefore was that this sudden economic downturn had obviously nothing to do with money or credit tightness.
Ever since, nonfinancial credit growth has sharply accelerated. In the fourth quarter of 2002, it hit a record of $1,612.8 billion, at annual rate, followed in the first quarter of 2003 by $1,338.3 billion. This coincided with simultaneous nominal growth of $388.4 billion and real GDP growth of $224.4 billion, both also at annual rate. For each dollar added to real GDP, there were thus six dollars added to the indebtedness of the nonfinancial sector.
Regards,
Kurt Richebächer, for The Daily Reckoning
P.S. During the 1960-70s, by the way, there was on average about 1.5 dollars of debt added for each dollar of additional GDP. Just extrapolate this escalating relationship between the use of debt and economic activity. And think of it: the GDP growth of today is tomorrow a thing of the past, while the debts incurred remain. Plainly, Greenspan's policy has collapsed into uncontrolled money and debt creation that has rapidly diminishing returns on economic activity.
As we noted in these pages last week, the late economist Hyman P. Mynsky would call this a Ponzi economy where debt payments on outstanding and soaring indebtedness are no longer met out of current income but through new borrowing. Soaring unpaid interests become capitalized.
Copyright © 2000-2003 Agora Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News
KEYWORDS: employment; joblosses; jobs; payrolls; unemployment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
To: Brilliant
Your supposition on job losses by state is quite prescient. The same "problem" was evident in 1991-1992.
Fortunately, Bush Country is not in a recession.
Frankly, what Republican cares about NY, MA, DC, and Californicator?
To: Starwind
In July, for example, it reported a decline in payrolls by 44,000, while job losses for June were revised upward from 30,000 to 72,000. For May, the retrospective upward revision was even from 17,000 to 70,000. There is still more spinning involved. The government adds every month some 30,000-50,000 imaginary workers to the job total. That explains a lot. Who do they think they are fooling? Those out of work, know they are out of work, and they will be voting in 2004. We came close to electing a socialist/communist government in the 1930's, but we had enough people on small farms who stopped it. These days, not many people left on small farms, and when they lose their jobs, they go hungrey and will vote for anyone else.
Long term, our current policy of eliminating all U.S. jobs and all U.S. manufacturing is fatal.
To: waterstraat
There will come a point when we pass the point of no return Considering the customers, IP, capital and time it takes to ramp industries, we may already have.
23
posted on
09/24/2003 6:57:46 PM PDT
by
Starwind
(The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the only true good news)
To: A. Pole
Falling employment can deepen recession in a vicious circle. Yep! The more americans that lose their jobs to asia, the less they spend, the less they pay taxes, etc.
To: Starwind; clamper1797; sarcasm; BrooklynGOP; A. Pole; Zorrito; GiovannaNicoletta; Caipirabob; ...
Ping on or off let me know
25
posted on
09/24/2003 6:59:29 PM PDT
by
harpseal
(stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
To: waterstraat
Once more a plan to start getting us back on track.
Acknowledgement RDB3 who helped hammer out this plan.
In no particular order of importance.
1. Get rid of government subsidies for offshore investment of US companies. OPIC is the first such program which should go but support of World Bank programs that subsidize the outflow of Capital would be another.
2. Use tariffs on those nations which are engaged in unfair trade practices such as currency manipulation (China and India for example), those nations which refuse to open their markets to US products (China for example with its 50% tariffs on US consumer goods and non tariff barriers), those nations that subsidize competition to American Industry (airbus for example) and those nations which have slave conditions for their workers.
3. Use tariffs and other means to prevent the relocation of jobs offshore that are essential to the national defense. If necessary take control of the company seeking to export vital technology or industry by means of eminent domain (No I do not like this last option and I will only defend its use as an absolute last resort like say in the case of rare earth magnets essential to smart bomb technology). Provide a hardened, widely distributed infrastructure to supply all that is needed for our military units and civil defense that can be continued to be deployed in the event of any military attack.
4. An immediate end to guest worker programs. If people wish to come to the USA to work and make a life let them immigrate according to the rules.
5 Provide economic development zones where the corporate income tax is zero for operations within these zones. In order to operate in this zone a company must agree to only purchase American components if available and employ only American citizens or legal immigrants in these operations. These economic development zones shall be eventually be expanded to include every bit of every state once the benefits are shown I would like them to be totally implemented immediately but I realize that may be overreaching. It must be stated for clarification that simply being in the geographic area of the zones does will not subject any company to any new mandatory regulation. Everything is voluntary for getting the exclusion from corporate taxation. The profit attributable to direct imports is subject to the same rules that exist everywhere else in this nation for corporate taxation. Only free from such taxation is the profit attributable to American content and any American improvement. In short no new mandatory regulation will be a part of this. It is my opinion that there will not be a lack of companies seeking this tax relief. And no the regulation implied is absolutely minimal in order to get this through.
6. Scale back unnecessary regulation including the tort system. Institute a cap on punitive damages, limits on class action suits, and limits on liability to the actual percentage of liability with no plaintiff able to collect if said plaintiff was involved in the commission of a felony at the time of the alleged tort or was more than 49% negligent in the alleged tort. Note that the loser in a frivolous lawsuit shall pay the attorney fees of the winner. There are many other regulatory structures that also need to be included that need to be included such as repealing the Family leave mandate, getting rid of OSHA etc.
7. Increase the domestic content in purchases by the Department of defense and give absolute preference in non-domestic content to proven allies of the USA over say the French or Germans. The only reason any content for DOD purchase may come from non US allies is that content is not available elsewhere and is essential.
8. Do not allow expense involved in moving operations overseas to be included in business expenses under the IRS code.
9. Prosecute for perjury anyone who has made a false statement in order to employ an H1B or L1 visa worker. I will be lenient on the actual perjurer if he/she was ordered to make this false statement and he/she provides testimony to aid in the conviction of the person ordering the perjury. Just because a person is a CEO does not give them a pass on criminal behavior.
10. Prosecute anyone who orders the transfer of vital defense technology or funds a R&D project that could be of use to our military overseas except to strong allies of the USA. Make the necessary enhancements to our espionage laws so that continued support or funding of any R&D in a nation whose government has threatened the USA is guilty of espionage. The UK and Australia come to mind as meeting these criteria for being eligible for transfer of technology first. There will be other nations and a gradation of what can be transferred to which specific nation. Under no circumstances may technology be transferred to any nation whose government has threatened the USA within five years without a complete change of government or specific exemption from Congress and the administration.
11. Deport all illegal aliens immediately and take measures that prevent the entry of any more illegal aliens. Fine all companies knowingly employing illegal aliens Criminal sanctions should be imposed on anyone helping an illegal alien stay in the USA in violation of our laws.
12. Decrease the punishing levels of taxation on companies and eliminate the double taxation on corporate dividends. See effects of item 5 for how minimal this will be if item 5 covers the entire USA. Eliminate all IRS provisions that inhibit free use of independent contractors by businesses for example section 1706.
13. Eliminate the minimum wage so that the worker can be paid based on productivity. Overtime compensation will remain the same but instead of 150% of the "wage" the worker would receive 150% of the production pay. If one through 13 are enacted # 14 becomes an irrelevancy as no one will be working for that low a wage.
Now since I started posting this plan another idea has come up that in my opinion is a very good policy that stands on its own. Now I give credit to Jim Gibson and Freeper Ed_in_NJ for coming up with the idea, separately to the best of my knowledge. However I can be corrected on that. The tariff phrasing is from Jim Gibson.
I suggest that the US Customs Department charge a $1,000-per-container inspection fee on every container entering the United States. This fee would be used to completely fund the cost of inspections. If we assumed that a four-man team could fully inspect two containers a day or about 500 per year, it would require 48,000 inspectors. Allowing for at least 2,000 support personnel, we would need at least 50,000 workers. Because these workers would require high intelligence and skill levels they should earn at least $30 per hour. At 40-hour weeks plus benefits, I estimate the cost per worker to be over $75,000 per year, all paid by the foreign manufacturers. Even so, this would still leave over $2.25 billion to cover all other costs. Any revenue not used would be used to compensate American workers displaced by foreign imports.
I urge and encourage everyone who agrees with this plan and or the terror tariff idea to communicate this to every politician you can think of.
26
posted on
09/24/2003 7:00:56 PM PDT
by
harpseal
(stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
To: waterstraat
Long term, our current policy of eliminating all U.S. jobs and all U.S. manufacturing is fatal.
Coming soon to a neighborhood near you,.....modern.....factory prisons.
27
posted on
09/24/2003 7:03:17 PM PDT
by
maestro
To: waterstraat
We came close to electing a socialist/communist government in the 1930's, But they elected a New Deal president so many times that Constitution had to be changed (term limit).
but we had enough people on small farms who stopped it.
These days, not many people left on small farms, and when they lose their jobs, they go hungrey and will vote for anyone else.
Free market fundamentalists forget that we do not live in XIXc when millions of people could return to the farms or fall back on subsistance economy. Today majority lives in the cities and bills do not stop coming. When masses of people drop out of job market they have no place to go anymore.
28
posted on
09/24/2003 7:05:11 PM PDT
by
A. Pole
To: Starwind
There is no such thing as a "jobless recovery."
Who is "recovering" if regular people cannot find jobs?
Earning wages is the foundation of an economy.
How often we hear about consumer spending driving the economy.
How can somebody be a consumer without earnings?
To: Brilliant
Need to see the breakdown between the states. I'm guessing that a disproportionate number of the losses are in Cal., Go here: Regional and State Employment and Unemployment (Monthly)
California, being the most populous and hi-tech/mfg oriented has the largest, Texas I think is 2nd, Florida 3rd...
30
posted on
09/24/2003 7:09:00 PM PDT
by
Starwind
(The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the only true good news)
To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
How can somebody be a consumer without earnings? Liberal use of credit cards followed by bankruptcy.
31
posted on
09/24/2003 7:11:02 PM PDT
by
sarcasm
(Tancredo 2004)
To: A. Pole
These days, not many people left on small farms, and when they lose their jobs, they go hungrey and will vote for anyone else. Free market fundamentalists forget that we do not live in XIXc when millions of people could return to the farms or fall back on subsistance economy. Today majority lives in the cities and bills do not stop coming. When masses of people drop out of job market they have no place to go anymore. My family, and all of our neighbors, got thru the GReat Depression pretty much ok, not much cash, but plenty to eat on our farms and ranches. Overall, our lives were not really affected much in the Great Depression except that we did not buy as many "city trinkets" as we used to. Thje Great Depression was certainly an inconvenience, but no big deal.
Next time, it will be different.
To: Starwind
The government adds every month some 30,000-50,000 imaginary workers to the job total. It is based on the assumption that in an economic recovery a lot of people start their own business. In normal recoveries, they have done so, indeed. That's what I did. It's tough, but things are definitely looking up.
33
posted on
09/24/2003 7:16:06 PM PDT
by
Noumenon
(Those who seek the destruction of a free society are unfit to live in that same society.)
To: sarcasm
How can somebody be a consumer without earnings? Liberal use of credit cards followed by bankruptcy. Why not? Big companies do it, like Kmart, Global Crossing, etc. Even rich people do it like Donald Trump,etc.
Anyways, after bankruptcy, welfare does not stop just because you are out of a job and no longer paying your share of taxes. The free traders are more than happy to pay the taxes that displaced workers no longer pay. All it means is that fewer people will be paying more taxes.
To: waterstraat
My family, and all of our neighbors, got thru the GReat Depression pretty much ok, not much cash, but plenty to eat on our farms and ranches. [...]Next time, it will be different. Of course. BTW, the craddle of free market fundamentalism - XIXc England had colonies like Australia to get rid of "excess" population. Landlocked Germany had to rely on paternalistic government, public education and safety net. When those institutions got weakened by the WWI victors , the next depression brought Hitler to power (also it could have brought German Stalin as an alternative).
35
posted on
09/24/2003 7:20:10 PM PDT
by
A. Pole
To: waterstraat
Why not? Big companies do it, like Kmart, Global Crossing, etc. Even rich people do it like Donald Trump,etc. The trick is to borrow enough so you're no longer a 'debtor', but become instead - a 'partner'.
Most folk don't get past asking for the application form at those levels.
36
posted on
09/24/2003 7:23:00 PM PDT
by
Starwind
(The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the only true good news)
To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
There is no such thing as a "jobless recovery." Absolutely correct. Stock prices are going up simply because payrolls are going down. The stock market simply is not the economy.
Personally, I'm learning to speak Spanish and investigating dual-citizenship options.
37
posted on
09/24/2003 7:29:14 PM PDT
by
The Duke
To: Starwind
Wait till those Mexican trucks start crossing the border. Thousands more will be displaced along with those jobs that support them.
The dream of the free traders is turning into everyone else's nightmare.
To: Starwind
Thank God for Richebacher! I thought I was nuts, KNOWING about un- and under-employment, while reading statistics which didn't seem to jibe with my understanding.
Even given that the Upper Midwest is in worse shape than other parts of the country, it STILL seemed worse than the stats showed.
But it's not. It's just worse than the SPIN.
Great!
39
posted on
09/24/2003 7:54:38 PM PDT
by
ninenot
(Democrats make mistakes. RINOs don't correct them.--Chesterton (adapted by Ninenot))
To: Starwind
The technical declaration that 'the recession ended 3Q01' was rather a shock to many people. While we can concede ad arguendam that it is true, the growth in GDP supporting the declaration has NOT been reflected in a growth in jobs.
Your scenario--that another recession will follow shortly--is very likely.
All that said, the recession in the manufacturing economy has NOT stopped. It started in late '99/early '00 and has been going full tilt ever since, with a few exceptions.
40
posted on
09/24/2003 7:59:30 PM PDT
by
ninenot
(Democrats make mistakes. RINOs don't correct them.--Chesterton (adapted by Ninenot))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson