Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Citrix Launches MetaFrame Password Manager, Preps MetaFrame XP Update
Security Pipeline ^ | 09/24/03 | Paula Rooney

Posted on 09/24/2003 1:37:57 PM PDT by bedolido

Citrix Systems has released its single sign-on product, even as it prepares to debut an enhanced version of MetaFrame XP. The Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.-based company said Wednesday it has begun shipping Citrix MetaFrame Password Manager, priced at $179 per user. MetaFrame Password Manager, one of several products billed under the company's new MetaFrame Access Suite brand, was developed under the code name of Project Bimini.

Once a user authenticates to a system using a single password, MetaFrame Password Manager automatically logs the user into any password-protected system while enforcing password policies. It also monitors all password-related events and can automate tasks such as password changes, the company said.

Citrix maintains that its single sign-on product compares favorably to other offerings because it does not require scripting or application-level integration. And Citrix solution providers say they're seeing strong interest in the product.

"We have a lot of people we've targeted for this product," said Paul Kunze, director of sales at IntraSystems, a Randolph, Mass.-based Citrix solution provider. "When you have people with multiple passwords, it tends to make people write down the passwords, and that's the last thing you want. If a remote user has multiple authentication keys and they have to log into different apps, you can have Password Manager intelligently learn their password."

Citrix, which is banking heavily on the security aspects of its terminal services software, plans to detail other enhanced products at its annual user conference next month, including a MetaFrame XP update, sources said. That product is expected to be available in October.

According to a Citrix document examined by CRN, the third feature release of MetaFrame XP will offer Windows Server 2003 support, Universal Print Driver II, SpeedScreen browser acceleration, Web Interface 2.0 (formerly NFuse) and simplified license activation.


TOPICS: Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: citrix; manager; metaframe; password; techindex; update; xp
Citrix is a mainframe piece of crap! It's slow and clumsy. We fight to keep it off our systems here.
1 posted on 09/24/2003 1:37:58 PM PDT by bedolido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Citrix is a mainframe piece of crap! It's slow and clumsy. We fight to keep it off our systems here.

Ditto here but some of our clients think it's the greatest thing since sliced bread. I can't fathom why because all it does is cause problems.

2 posted on 09/24/2003 2:05:40 PM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *tech_index
I'm not a fan, but Citrix has it's uses.

I've had to support it, at a client's site.

3 posted on 09/24/2003 2:11:57 PM PDT by Dominic Harr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
Hmmm -

It lets you patch MS products on the server farm, instead of making you push 100's of megs to users every couple of weeks.

It lets you deploy apps that would have required bandwidth upgrades.

It lets users run their apps on any PC, without installing 100's of megs, yadda, yadda. Just get IE running.

Users can run SAP on an IPaq - been done, I don't recommend it.

No problems here - we've got 1500 users on ours.
4 posted on 09/24/2003 2:11:58 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
No problems here - we've got 1500 users on ours.

Our clients, for the most part, aren't that sophisticated and tend to have problems with it. And when they have problems they call us, their accounting/timekeeping software vendor, rather than work to set Citrix up correctly. If we had a client that had 1500 users I would imagine that they would have enough trained staff to set it up the way it should be.

5 posted on 09/24/2003 2:30:47 PM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
Thats true, I work for the user company(Fortune 500), and we have a centralized installation of Citrix, with staff, etc.

One thing that I would recommend is to get an experienced VAR to set up your Citrix farm.
6 posted on 09/24/2003 3:47:15 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
It lets you patch MS products on the server farm, instead of making you push 100's of megs to users every couple of weeks. It lets you deploy apps that would have required bandwidth upgrades. It lets users run their apps on any PC, without installing 100's of megs, yadda, yadda. Just get IE running. Users can run SAP on an IPaq - been done, I don't recommend it. No problems here - we've got 1500 users on ours.

We have over 2500 (large grocery retailer based in Idaho. It's Your Store). Yes you don't have to load applications onto each PC but then you have to fight with the others for IP time. It's slow and clumsy. For a small company, it's probably great. for a large one (we have the latest and best of everything here), it's a dog. As I said before... we fight to keep it off our computers.

7 posted on 09/25/2003 6:21:47 AM PDT by bedolido (I can forgive you for killing my sons, but I cannot forgive you for forcing me to kill your sons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson