Posted on 09/24/2003 11:38:11 AM PDT by CHUCKfromCAL
Pressure mounted on Sen. Tom McClintock to withdraw from the gubernatorial race Tuesday as Sen. Minority Leader Jim Brulte endorsed rival Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger. Brulte joined other GOP leaders in voicing fears that McClintock and Schwarzenegger will split the Republican vote and ensure victory for Democratic Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante.
The endorsement dealt a blow to McClintock, especially since Brulte has long been a supporter. Brulte co-chaired McClintock's campaign for state controller last year and raised significant amounts of money for him. But Brulte noted that McClintock continues to place third in statewide polls. A survey released last week by the Public Policy Institute of California showed Bustamante at 28 percent, Schwarzenegger at 26 percent and McClintock at 14 percent. "I believe that his candidacy puts at risk not only the election of a Republican governor, but the recall itself," Brulte said. He added that "countless" people have told him they are considering voting against the recall out of fear that Bustamante will win.
Brulte's comments came a day after Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Vista, who bankrolled the recall drive, said that if the two leading GOP candidates remain in the race, people should consider voting "no" on the recall to avoid a Bustamante victory.
The stepped-up pressure highlights the angst within the Republican Party over the best way to achieve victory with two major Republicans in the race. It underscores the philosophical differences that have plagued the California GOP for years. McClintock represents the conservative wing that has dominated party conventions, but has had difficulty attracting the broader support needed to win a statewide election. Schwarzenegger is a fiscal conservative who holds more moderate views on such social issues as abortion, gun control and gay rights.
"The mainstream Republican Party is tired of losing elections because of the conservative wing," said Barbara O'Connor, political communications professor at Sacramento State. McClintock gave no indication he will bow to the pressure. "We are not dropping out under any circumstances," said John Stoos, his northern California campaign director. "We are the only one of the campaigns that is showing any momentum," Stoos said. "The Arnold Schwarzenegger campaign has been stalled for five weeks." Stoos noted that McClintock has received contributions from 13,052 people, 95 percent of whom gave less than $250 each, and that he remains confident he can pull into first place by Election Day.
The pressure for the GOP to unite behind one candidate takes on added urgency as absentee votes roll in. More than 700,000 people have already voted by absentee ballot, Secretary of State Kevin Shelley's office said Tuesday.
"Every day that McClintock stays in the race, he is splitting the vote," said Jack Pitney, a government professor at Claremont McKenna College. Brulte maintained that Indian tribes are backing McClintock only because they want to split the GOP vote and ensure a Bustamante victory. The Morongo Band of Mission Indians has pumped nearly $500,000 into independent expenditure committees to support McClintock, according to an analysis by Common Cause. Bustamante has received more than $3.3 million in contributions from Indian tribes. But Stoos discounted such claims, arguing that the tribes are supporting the two people who have backed them in the past.
By remaining in the race, McClintock faces the possibility of a backlash within his party if he is viewed as the spoiler. "If he's perceived as helping Bustamante be elected governor, he's going to have some real tough times in the Republican Party and his own district," said GOP analyst Allan Hoffenblum. McClintock will be up for re-election in his Senate seat next year. The heightened pressure comes on the eve of the first debate that will include Schwarzenegger. Brulte urged McClintock not to attack his fellow Republican in today's event. That advice came as Schwarzenegger unveiled an ad that implicitly criticizes McClintock and Bustamante for accepting contributions from Indian tribes that run gambling casinos. "We don't have any plans to go after Mr. Schwarzenegger" during the debate, Stoos said. "Tom sees it as an opportunity to put forward ideas he has for taking California in a new direction and holding other major candidates accountable for consistency in what they're saying. If that's an attack, so be it."
(Excerpt) Read more at bayarea.com ...
And we know that's all being a Republican means nowadays. Just win, baby!
The GOP establishment has never supported Tom. There is nothing to cut off.
For goodness sake, if these people had any character, they'd be in this thing too. Darn disappointing about Perot especially since that sucking sound is strongest in Cali!
Get over it; he's not quitting, he never lied.
Of course they tarred and feathered him for it - what did you expect the democrats would do- tell the truth?
Some of us actually listened to what Lundgren had to say and made up our own minds. Lundgren was much more centrist than you seem to remember.
If its any consolation the state's potheads would agree with you.
They along with Davis were constantly calling Lundgren the "ideal conservative".
It will never happen. McClintock is a cash cow for the party. He is in a safe district and the GOP wouldn't dare put someone up against him. You outsiders seem to forget that Schwarzenegger is the carpetbagger in this race. He's the Hillary Clinton of California politics. McClintock represents the hard core REPUBLICAN right.
Furthermore, it is the McClintock voters who will turn out in numbers to vote "Yes" on the recall. If McClintock drops from the race, Gray Davis could hold on to his position (he's about 10-15% behind with 12 days to go). Every McClintock vote is also a vote for recalling the Governor.
I'm sorry you have to commute from Texas. As a former Dallas resident, I know about the Los Angeles to Dallas-Ft. Worth or Houston flight. Always crowded. Always bumpy over the southern Rockies in New Mexico.
The founders were classical liberals. And, remember, there were plenty of colonists who were still loyal to the crown during the Revolution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.