Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: azhenfud
On another thread, I posted an analysis of the court's decision (post no. 203 or something like that). That's where the real issue lies -- Congress expressly authorized the FCC, back in 1992, to create a "do not call list," but the FCC did nothing. Congress never expressly authorized the FTC to create a "do not call list," but the FTC began the process of creating a list anyway. Then in 2003, Congress appropriated money to the FTC to facilitate the "do not call list," even though Congress never authorized the FTC to create the list in the first place. The issue is whether Congress, in appropriating the money, implicitly ratified the FTC's action, given the express delegation of authority to the FCC back in 1992. The court said "no." I disagree, but I wouldn't call the judge an idiot. Congress, certainly, but not the judge in this particular case.
96 posted on 09/24/2003 12:52:42 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: Labyrinthos
It's gonna get interesting, because 10/1 is less than a week away.
111 posted on 09/24/2003 1:30:33 PM PDT by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson