Replies

Funny how those who insist on drafting women are the same people (you being a probable exception) who build the abortion clinics, give RU-486 to minors without their parents' knowledge, teach sodomy in public schools and push Title IX, to the detriment of our sons and daughters.

If conservatives are to be effective, we need to be consistent.

"Women in combat" demeans women by forcing them to behave like men; and demeans the men who allow it.

Is the world a better place in these past four decades? Or are we living through a real Matrix, inconceivable a generation ago, that desires the occultic obliteration of sexual distinctions?

"Women in combat" is the homosexual dream-come-true.

I'm against any forced conscription. But the military is a profession that requires a masculine aggression, and should stay that way.

Unless we really want more Hillary Clintons and Janet Renos.

Funny how those who insist on drafting women are the same people (you being a probable exception) who build the abortion clinics, give RU-486 to minors without their parents' knowledge, teach sodomy in public schools and push Title IX, to the detriment of our sons and daughters.

Nonsense and gratuitous projection on your part. Women want to supplant men. Laying the blame on men for that is ridiculous so long as women control their own lives.

I believe my comment was military service...that doesn't mean combat service. Plenty of women served in WWII, Korea and Vietnam in non-combat roles. The women pilots in WWII come to mind who flew non-combat missions for plane transport. They made d@mn fine pilots. I use that example due to the fact I love to fly, but I digress. I still think 2yrs of military service would not necessarily be a bad thing.

Red