Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeTheHostages
I don't like the ACLU nor their tactics, but i feel everybody should have similar access. Freedom of speech is the No. 1 ammendment to the constitution, right?

If i were protesting Xlinton, i would want to be as close as any Xlinton supporter, albeit with an odor removing breathing apparatus and full foul weather gear to keep his spewing DNA off of me.
9 posted on 09/24/2003 8:02:02 AM PDT by ctlpdad (If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ctlpdad
I don't like the ACLU nor their tactics, but i feel everybody should have similar access. Freedom of speech is the No. 1 ammendment to the constitution, right?

No. Freddom of "politcal speech" is the No. 1 amendment. Spewing hate of the man is different than disagreeing with his policies.
12 posted on 09/24/2003 8:11:06 AM PDT by LetsRok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: ctlpdad
no one's saying they can't speak -- they're saying that people with a proven record of violence and an inclination to get physical shouldn't get too close to the president

time, place, and manner
18 posted on 09/24/2003 8:23:57 AM PDT by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: ctlpdad
don't like the ACLU nor their tactics, but i feel everybody should have similar access. Freedom of speech is the No. 1 ammendment to the constitution, right?

The government can impose reasonable "time, place, and manner" restrictions upon free speech, provided the restrictions are content neutral. In the absence of a specfic threat to our President, I don't think the Secret Service can treat the anti-Bush wacko protestors differently than the pro-Bush supporters. That being said, I suspect that the facts are substantially different than what the ACUL has alleged in that both Bush protestors and Bush supporters are either treated the same or are treated differently for reasons having nothing to do with the content of the speech (i.e., the size of the group and general safety concerns.)

The bigger question is where was the ACLU during the Clintoon years when he and the first witch regularly used and abused the secret service to keep protestors far away from the spotlight.

28 posted on 09/24/2003 8:46:25 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: ctlpdad
***PET PEEVE ALERT***

I don't like the ACLU nor their tactics, but i feel everybody should have similar access.

AAGGGHH!!!! No!! No! You do NOT FEEL everybody should have similar access, you believe or think or desire, but not feel! You feel hungry or happy or horny or sad, you do not feel abstract concepts devoid of physical sensations.

There's too much "feelin'" going on out there!!

rant

29 posted on 09/24/2003 8:49:00 AM PDT by lafroste
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: ctlpdad
No one has a 'Right' to be close to the president.
Wonder if Hinckley is behind this one.
Wasn't he demonstrating his 'right' to
get close to Reagan?
137 posted on 09/24/2003 2:29:36 PM PDT by Warren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson