This is a good issue for the courts because they will be very deferential to such an important public interest as protecting the President, but they will have a broader view than the Secret Service.
The tricky issue is not safety but order- and under the First amendment the courts will allow only minimal restrictions on that count ( which these Clinton-era restrictions overstep IMHO).
It's a great example of the First Amendment in action in the real world, just the kind of issue it was made for.
I agree, although I have little faith in the courts upholding the Constitution. They have an abysmal track record to date.
You have a good point about the SS. They are beholden to the President. When he says jump, they say how high. Those with decent memories will remember what Hillary had them to do protesters. But even if they don't remember now, she'll be sure to give them a refresher course if she gets the chance.
And on that day, if I'm not banned, I'll be here to bump this thread to the top and give you all a great big "I told you so.".