[freeeee]

This was wrong when Clinton did it.

It just as wrong when Bush does it.

It used to surprise me when I see FReepers defending the same behavior as the Clintons, but hypocrisy has been the norm here for some time.

Behold hypocrites, the only 'free speech zone':

[FreeTheHostages]

You're kidding yourself if you think this is about speech. These anti-Bush people have proven themselves to be violent time and time again.

Look at the Inauguration Day parade -- ACLU sued to let anti-Bush protestors close to the route. Then they were destructive, taking down flags at the Navy memorial and surging toward police lines, and it all got physical.

This is not the same thing as peaceful protests against Clinton.

[DaGman]

Don't some people notice that there is no difference between Freeping Clinton or Hillary and protesting Bush? To me, this is a clear case of "be careful what you ask for" if you want the ACLU to lose. If the ACLU loses, everyone, regardless of the protesters will be required to be in some "free speech zone".