Skip to comments.
Journalist [Helen Thomas]gets mixed reception at BYU forum
Provo Daily Herald ^
| Sept. 24, 2003
Posted on 09/24/2003 7:07:01 AM PDT by lady lawyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: lady lawyer
Hmmm.. I bet she didn't get an invite to tour any temples. You never want the devil on consecrated ground.
21
posted on
09/24/2003 8:01:22 AM PDT
by
Cate
To: lady lawyer
Stupid old liberal. She thinks that all college campuses are like Harvard, so she just assumed she was safe.
22
posted on
09/24/2003 8:04:58 AM PDT
by
jpl
To: Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
Yeah, that's a good idea!
23
posted on
09/24/2003 8:15:59 AM PDT
by
IYAS9YAS
(Go Fast, Turn Left!)
To: lady lawyer
When questioned why the national press is labeled as liberal, she laughed and said, "That's a myth now. It's not true. I wish I could find some friends." If you can paint your opponent as an extremist and yourself as sweet reason, you have won the debate. So "objectivity" is the high PR ground, and it is natural for journalists to use their PR power to claim it. The easy way to success being to go along and get along, journalists have adopted a system for avoiding unnecessary contention for the status of "objective journalist." Adherence to this code by journalists means that it is sensible to speak of "journalism" as an entity, an Estatblishment.
It is of the nature of an Establishment that, like the mafia, it "doesn't exist"--but you'd better not cross it! The journalistic Establishment coheres in the following code:
The objectivity of anyone who adheres to the party line that journalists are objective is never challenged by any other member of journalism Establishment. If a Bernard Goldberg does write a Bias, he does not cease being a journalist--he is an unperson who never was a journalist.
"That's a myth now. It's not true Yeah, Helen. Right . . . </sarcasm>
Why Broadcast Journalism is
Unnecessary and Illegitimate
24
posted on
09/24/2003 8:36:56 AM PDT
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The everyday blessings of God are great--they just don't make "good copy.")
To: lady lawyer
I can't believe she was invited to speak. How much was she paid and who's money was wasted?
25
posted on
09/24/2003 5:23:49 PM PDT
by
LaraCroft
(We Will Never Allow Them to Forget)
To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
I just read it in the newspaper. Yikes, I won't be so nice, and I will say "What were they thinking???"
To: Frank_Discussion
"Start talking! My god, the silence in this country," she said. "There's too much silence in this country. People should start expressing themselves." I did express myself, directly to her, via e-mail, regarding one of her columns.
Based on her surly response, she did not appear to appreciate my self-expression.
27
posted on
09/24/2003 9:09:17 PM PDT
by
okie01
(www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
To: okie01
LOL...... about part for the course. Typical of the DemocRATS - they can dish it out but they can't take it!
To: lady lawyer
Was this appearance a preview for HALLOWEEN?
To: jpl
Stupid old liberal. She thinks that all college campuses are like Harvard, so she just assumed she was safe. Another stupid old liberal, Molly Ivins, learned not to make that mistake about Texas A&M.
30
posted on
09/24/2003 9:18:34 PM PDT
by
Mark Turbo
(Safety: The official state religion.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson