Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rftc
I am not sure what you mean by verified. It looks like Gertz simply reported that it was in a gubmint report last week, which I found odd. I respect Gertz as a gutsy national security writer, but this wreaks of recycling old news for propaganda effects.

Of course, Carl has yet to print a correction that Salman Pak was not linked to 9/11, but nevertheless:

Sunday, April 6, 2003 2:48 p.m. EDT

Saddam's 9/11 Hijack Training Camp Destroyed
http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2003/4/6/144706
10 posted on 09/24/2003 7:19:47 AM PDT by JohnGalt (More Todd Beamers, Fewer Ivy Leaguers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: JohnGalt
I'm not sure where in that article there is made a link between Salman Pak and 9/11. I think you cannot deny that there was a link between Salman Pak and terrorists training. Perhaps not specific 9/11 terrorists but terrorists nonetheless. If your interpretation is such, then you are making the leap.
14 posted on 09/24/2003 7:27:51 AM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
Gertz has great inside sources....there is a reason.
15 posted on 09/24/2003 7:28:00 AM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson