Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Conservababe
Oh the private developer paid a fair price, everyone that signed up for the sell to begin with got atleast twice what their property was worth. These last nine were greedy and wanted way too much. For example, this marketing design company wanted one million for this little two bedroom house that they used as an office, needless to say it wasn't apraised that high.

Also if I get offered what these people did, I will sign up in a heartbeat to sell and I wouldn't care who the developer was. Don't mistake me as someone who is tied to my home.
15 posted on 09/24/2003 7:21:36 AM PDT by areeves79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: areeves79
If someone doesn't want to sell then there is no such thing as a fair price.
16 posted on 09/24/2003 7:24:07 AM PDT by Durus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: areeves79
These last nine were greedy and wanted way too much. For example, this marketing design company wanted one million for this little two bedroom house that they used as an office, needless to say it wasn't apraised that high.

Irrelevant. If I want something & the owner insists on an outrageous price, I simply refrain from purchasing it. I DON'T hold a gun to his head as a negotiating tactic.

21 posted on 09/24/2003 7:41:38 AM PDT by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: areeves79
These last nine were greedy and wanted way too much. For example, this marketing design company wanted one million for this little two bedroom house that they used as an office, needless to say it wasn't apraised that high.

If they wanted a million bucks for their property, then the developer should have paid if he wanted it that badly. If he didn't want to do so, he should have said goodbye to the plan.

But this running to the government to have eminent domain enacted to steal private property for private business...has to stop.

I will guess that your city government argued that they would get more taxes from the Mall than from property owners, thus it was in the public good.

Okay, if they get away with this, the next time around the developers will offer below appraisal and go to the city again if sellers balk.

22 posted on 09/24/2003 7:44:26 AM PDT by Conservababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: areeves79
These last nine were greedy and wanted way too much. For example, this marketing design company wanted one million for this little two bedroom house that they used as an office, needless to say it wasn't apraised that high.

Greedy? I think they call it "location location location". If a person owns the property then they have the right to demand any price for it. A property owner also has the right to not sell.

The government has no right to force citizens to sell their property so a private developer may benefit. If the property owners can't work out a deal in the free market then it's "game over". Tough luck for the developer. The idea of having the government deciding "fair market value" is really absurd.

I can't believe there are people who think this government-assisted theft of property is justified. It's really quite disturbing.
26 posted on 09/24/2003 7:55:50 AM PDT by Eric Cassano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson