Replies

I can see you have spent a lot of time looking at this issue and I guess we will just have to disagree.

I stongly believe Oswald was the lone gunman and all of the physical evidence points this way. Oswald was a commie nut job who hated Kennedy for his position on Cuba. He defected to the Soviet Union and had a Russian wife. He carried a long wrapped package to work that day. At least one of the shots came from the TSBD as proven by the Connally trajectory. There are nummerous photos of people looking up at the TSBD after one of the shots was fired.

Finally, if you are going to set Oswald up as a patsy, you don't put a second or third gunman at a different location, like the grassy knoll, because it would create conflicting forensic evidence. Nobody that stupid would be able to cover their tracks for 40 years.

I have spent many years studying this. I'm not going to try to convince you to change your mind, and I do respect that you believe that LHO was the Lone Gunman. We will have to agree to disagree on that point. In my professional opinion, Lee did not have the skill to make the shots he's accused of making. Nobody will ever be able to convince me to the contrary.

Personally I believe that Lee was an Intelligence Operative. There are too many things in his past that indicate a connection to either the DIA or the CIA.

You're not going to get anywhere with the detractors. They don't understand the Zapruder film at all. They'll continue to bring up nonsense like a missing brain and ignore the skull and head pictures and x-rays. After all, no one stole his skull, did they? They are fully aware of "cratering" but that doesn't fit into their dreamworld.

A bunched up jacket becomes "evidence" but the actual measured picture of the back wound is ignored.

They continue a line of supposed people on the knoll and ignore the people who were standing next to the fence who didn't hear or see anyone behind the fence. The picture of the people standing in front of the fence look pretty calm despite a so-called bullet whizzing past their ears.

The funniest one is the so-called half blind witness because he didn't wear his glasses that day. They neglect to say that he was far-sighted.

It's all very amusing if you have the time and provides an idea of credibilty for other threads.

I'm still wondering how they make the excuse a number of WWII bullets can only go two inches into a person and disappear.