To: tpaine
Of that I'm not sure, but there's also been some suggestion that Oswald never got anything from Klein's at all, but I won't quote that here because I have no first hand knowledge of it nor any evidence to support it.
152 posted on
10/03/2003 9:38:48 AM PDT by
Leatherneck_MT
(If you continue to do what you've always done, you will continue to get what you've a‚i]±s got.)
To: Leatherneck_MT
Examination of the order forms provided by the WCR certainly does not convince me that it was filled out by Oswald. Actually the gun ordered from the form is not the gun taken from the Depository since they are different lengths. No one ever saw him pick up ANY package at the P.O., no one other than Oswald was authorized to have mail sent to the box nor was anyone else authorized to pick up mail.
Apparently the alias, Alex Hidell, was one used by several operatives any one of whom could have picked up the gun.
155 posted on
10/03/2003 9:44:47 AM PDT by
justshutupandtakeit
(America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
To: Leatherneck_MT; snooter55; justshutupandtakeit
Also.. -- Did the 'Oswald' rifles scope mounting leave open the option of using that rifles original sights?
-tpaine-
Leatherneck_MT wrote:
Of that I'm not sure, ---
Me neither..
Isn't it amazing that apparently the Report did not address that issue?
Perhaps we could get one of my favorite gun experts to look up the facts of the matter in the 26 volume Scottish lawbooks.. Snooter?
179 posted on
10/03/2003 4:44:31 PM PDT by
tpaine
( I'm trying to be Mr Nice Guy, but politics keep getting in me way. ArnieRino for GovernatorQ)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson