[justshutupandtakeit]

I am no firearms expert so maybe you could respond to post #140. While I see many problems with that account all I would get would be insinuations about my lack of firearms expertise from Shooter. And dumbass demands I answer some irrelevant question.

BTW Thank you for your service to our country. I have never had such pride in our military.

[Leatherneck_MT]

Several things are wrong with that post.

The first being that the shooter is on the same elevation as his target.

Oswald allegedly was 6 floors above.

The second being that the target the shooter is engaging is stationary.

Oswald's was moving

The third being that we have no accurate record of what the shooter's skill level is with a firearm. We see him say that he has fired less than 20 times with a rifle. So be it. How many rounds has he fired those 20 times? What's his natural skill with a rifle?

To me post #140 is a none issue. There is no background of the person's skill level with weapons and for all I know he could be lying about the entire thing.

The MC is not an accurate weapon.

Oswald was a marginal shooter at best.

Post 140 changes none of that.

[Leatherneck_MT]

In response to you thanking me for my service, I find it a bit awkward to even respond to that, but you took the time to thank me and I will take the time to say you're welcome.

But better yet if you (or anyone for that matter) wish to thank a service man for their service, make a donation to the USO. Books, movies, money. Anything that goes there goes to help our sons and daughters, Husbands and wives stationed overseas.

Or, get the address of a youngster overseas and write him or her a letter.

That does far more for them than you can possibly imagine.

Semper Fi