Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zeroisanumber
Bush himself has come out denying that there was a Saddam/Al Quaeda link, we would do well to drop this false lead before it becomes the next Democrat talking point.

False statement. Bush has said there is no hard evidence linking Saddam with 9-11. There is circumstantial evidence that Saddam knew of the plan and may have provided assistance. The best we have is a Czech intel report of M. Atta, the “field commander” meeting with Saddam’s spy chief in Prague several months before 9-11. The CIA has said that they don’t consider that evidence enough to prove a link since they have no way of verifying that meeting took place or what may have been discussed.

There is plenty of very hard evidence linking Saddam with Islamic terror groups including UBL and with numerous terror attacks around the world including the 1993 WTC bombing which was most likely funded and supported by Saddam. One of the perps in that attack was actually an Iraqi spook who had Kuwaiti papers forged and placed in the Kuwaiti state records during Saddam's reign of terror there in 1990 to make this guy look to be a native-born Kuwaiti citizen. He was setting up sleepers and false-flag operatives even then.

42 posted on 09/24/2003 2:02:31 PM PDT by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto
"including the 1993 WTC bombing which was most likely funded and supported by Saddam."


Tin-foil hat material. Even Daniel Pipes makes fun of this theory.
46 posted on 09/24/2003 2:13:23 PM PDT by JohnGalt (More Todd Beamers, Fewer Ivy Leaguers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson