Skip to comments.
Kelsey Grammer Eyeing Senate Run
Newsmax ^
| Tuesday Sept. 23, 2003
Posted on 09/23/2003 7:28:15 PM PDT by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
To: SoCal_Republican
![](http://www.filmsondisc.com/images/scarface.jpg)
You dont tell me I cant be no politician !
41
posted on
09/23/2003 10:13:19 PM PDT
by
Delta 21
(Blindly posting without reading the entire article or even one post since 1998.)
To: nickcarraway
He will have to refrain from driving his Viper upside down.
To: Sideshow Bob
You are just a tool of Birch Barlow!
To: nickcarraway
On Tuesday, Hannity announced that Grammer would reprise his TV role as a talk radio host by filling in on the Fox talker's nationally syndicated radio show sometime next week. This is Kelsey Grammer.... I'm listening...
My parents have met him in Hawaii (maybe he will run for Senator there!) where he also has a place. He seems to be a very nice, non-Hollywood, accessible guy.
44
posted on
09/23/2003 10:50:50 PM PDT
by
Yaelle
To: nickcarraway
I felt bad for him when he said that because he's sure to have his bubble burst. He might manage some lower office, maybe even make the House of Reps if he runs in the right district. But he doesn't have the clout or the past to successfully run for the Senate. I like the guy, but he's not going to be a Senator.
What would be really great is if he voiced a couple campaign ads for the Republicans.
To: nickcarraway
Ahhhhnold for Governor
Kelsey Grammer for Senate
Shannon Dougherty for Lt. Governor
Clint Eastwood for Attorney General
Tom Selleck for Secretary of State
Bo Derek for Controller
Dennis Miller for Treasurer
Bruce Willis for Insurance Commisioner
Ricky Shroeder for Superintendent of Public Schools
To: All
Okay, I have now read all the post on this thread (up to 46 at this time) and the one thing they have in common is my perception that no one actually saw Kelsey Grammer on "Hannity and Colmes".
First, his politics. Sean brought it up and continues to say "in California" (Sean gets a little too excited sometimes). Grammer clearly says (try listening folks) he would one day like to run for the Senate "from what ever state I'm living in".
He then fleshed out his argument when Sean asked if he would consider a governorship. Kelsey is a little to naive when he thinks being 1 of 100 (again, Sean made this point) that he could help the nation. But maybe he could, who knows. It was obvious by his statements that he wants to represent his state ("where ever I'm living" he said" in the US Senate and he also wants to work on national policy).
He especially said he wanted to fight the myth that this country is all about the "rich vs. the poor" and said "it never has been".
Yes, he said he's somewhat more centrist but he also said he clearly leaned farther to the right. And when Colmes brought up his past and his problems, he didn't pull a Clinton and waffle. He said, "I was screwed up, I got help, I'll never do that again" in so many words. He even said, "thanks to FoxNews, more of us conservatives can come out of the closet (referencing Hollywood)" and told Alan that it's not really such a liberal bastion as is believed.
He also said there was nothing left in his closet since it's all been aired. And isn't the mantra of the left to forgive and move on?
As to his reasons, he said that he was raised by his grandfather that was a military man that showed him everyone should serve. He himself didn't go the military route so he wants to serve as an elected official. But of course that attitude has become somewhat tainted over the years. That is proved by those on this post pooh-poohing Grammer.
He also said they were going to end "Frasier" this year but not because he cared to. He made it clear that NBC has made no move to ask them back. He even said he'd do another season after this one if they asked and went so far to say he'd do it for no money.
But what got me was the entire time we was humble, smiling, coherent, centered, and obviously now at one with himself and his life. He has plenty of money, a beautiful wife and 4 year old daughter (that I hear he had to endure many medical procedures to produce due to some fertility problems).
I have to declare I've always like "Frasier". I didn't care for his character that much on "Cheers" though. I think it is one of the best comedy shows written in that it's smart and they don't have to resort to silly situations and predictable lines. And it's obvious they make fun of his arrogant and pompous lifestyle. The "elite" are treated as the phonies they are.
But again, he said he had no plan to run for office. He clearly said he thought about it in the future.
I wish more people would watch, listen or read about what was actually said before attacking without basis.
47
posted on
09/24/2003 12:30:29 AM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(While Bush doesn't usually please my conservative heart, no DimbulboRat can keep us safe!)
To: nickcarraway
You are just a tool of Birch Barlow! But do you get the inside joke?
Does anyone else appreciate why it is humorous that Sideshow Bob would be supportive of Kelsey Grammer for an elective office?
48
posted on
09/24/2003 7:32:35 AM PDT
by
Sideshow Bob
(There must not be too many Simpsons fans reading this thread!)
To: Nathaniel Fischer
A guess he won't be running against Barbara Boxer, then...nor any other Democrat for that matter, since venom and personal attacks seem to be about all 'rats stand for these days......
To: jocon307
The reason there are so many lawyers running for office is that they ran out of ambulances to chase.
50
posted on
09/24/2003 9:47:18 PM PDT
by
jraven
To: af_vet_rr
The problem (as I see it) with the "people who have been working hard for many years, down in the trenches, doing the tough political work," is that the motivation necessary for those many years of wallowing in unsavory nastiness is in itself a mark of Cain.
Who would willingly suffer such ignominy? One must either be an egregious fanatic (in a political sense - which means that one's obsession is concerned with achieving governmental power, directly or indirectly, to compel obedience from people otherwise unwilling to do one's bidding) or a calculatingly exploitative thieving booger who seeks political power because he wants to make it "pay off" in some materially advantageous manner.
Neither type of person makes a very good neighbor, and neither can clear-headedly be trusted with public office by any sane, reasonable, actively thinking individual.
Consider the notion that the *BEST* possible thing to do to such people is to "knock them off their feet and throw all their hard work away."
"The fanatic is not really a stickler to principle. He embraces a cause not primarily because of its justness or holiness but because of his desperate need for something to hold onto." -- Eric Hoffer
To: Justanother GP
Consider the notion that the *BEST* possible thing to do to such people is to "knock them off their feet and throw all their hard work away." I agree with a lot of what you are saying, but it can/will open the door for RINOs to come in, and because of name recognition, the things they do/say that are not what you or I might consider to be Conservative in nature will be ignored. I know, not all Republicans are Conservatives and not all Conservatives are Republican.
I would like to see all politicans, of both parties, swept out of office every 10 years or so. Most of our politicans, of both parties, care more about being a politician than about representing you or I. They can talk about how they do stuff on behalf of us, for us, etc., but it's a bunch of b.s.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson