Skip to comments.
The War Against the Cross (221 year old Historic Cross to be removed and destroyed?)
The Intellectual Conservative ^
| 21 September 2003
| Hans Zieger
Posted on 09/23/2003 6:13:00 PM PDT by softengine
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: softengine
They seek to break us."They" think they're winning. They are wrong. Look around, Christians are stronger than they think.
21
posted on
09/23/2003 7:44:43 PM PDT
by
xJones
To: softengine
First, the City of Ventura, California is under fire for displaying an historic cross
that was erected 221 years ago by the missionary-explorer Junipero Serra.
Serra established the San Buenaventura Mission in 1782, naming it and Ventura after
the Franciscan Priest St. Bonaventure. Today, Serras mission is a registered state landmark.
First the cross.
Then they'll find a way to get the mission (and all the others) de-registered
because it violates "church and state".
Then they'll buy and flatten the missions because they represent colonial slavery and
European hegemony.
It'll be interesting to see the missions dynamited, just like that one huge cathedral
the Commies took down in Moscow.
But our resident atheists should note the futility of this pursuit.
That cathedral has been rebuilt in Moscow.
And if they push their agenda too far, they can go the way of the Soviets.
22
posted on
09/23/2003 7:45:32 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: VOA
Love the "obsessive-compulsive, with persecution complex" analysis. Too funny. Too accurate....too.
23
posted on
09/23/2003 7:53:59 PM PDT
by
softengine
(Leftists - the preferred chew treat of 200lb Saint Bernards.)
To: softengine
INTREP
To: VOA
Serras mission is a registered state landmark. I don't know about CA, but the law providing for designation and registration of a site as a State (Historical or Archaeological) Landmark in Texas has some serious teeth.
That city council would be in a heap of trouble if they tried to dispose of a Texas Landmark! (The whole purpose of landmark designation is to protect what has been identified as an irreplacable cultural resource.)
25
posted on
09/23/2003 8:30:42 PM PDT
by
TXnMA
(No Longer!!! -- and glad to be back home in God's Gountry!!)
To: softengine
obsessive-compulsive, with persecution complex"
Honestly, I look at the photo in post 14...and think that only a mentally-disturbed
person could become agitated at the sight of a symbol of a code/religion that
s/he thinks is nothing but pure hokum...
Me, I see the Muslim symbols and I just hiss...I see the old Soviet symbols and
just chuckle over the relics of a broken "religion".
26
posted on
09/23/2003 8:40:03 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: Windcatcher
Checked out this URL. Words do not adequately convey the monstrousness of these deeds, nor the destructive capability of this form of 'government'.
27
posted on
09/23/2003 8:55:55 PM PDT
by
softengine
(Leftists - the preferred chew treat of 200lb Saint Bernards.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson