Skip to comments.
Clark 'Chose Democrats After White House Brush-off'
The Telegraph (UK) ^
| 9-23-2003
| David Rennie
Posted on 09/22/2003 7:07:13 PM PDT by blam
Clark 'chose Democrats after White House brush-off'
By David Rennie in Washington
(Filed: 23/09/2003)
General Wesley Clark, who soared to the head of the field for the Democratic presidential nomination after his late entry to the race, found his momentum checked yesterday by a string of leaks aggressive even by Washington standards.
Senior Republicans revealed details of an extraordinary conversation in which Gen Clark, a decorated Vietnam veteran and former Nato supreme commander, complained that he had wanted to be part of the Republican Bush administration, but switched party after being given the brush-off by the White House.
The latest edition of Newsweek magazine reports that - after the Sept 11 attacks - Gen Clark thought he would be invited to join the Bush administration's national security team.
However, the proposal was reportedly squashed by the White House political chief, Karl Rove.
A furious Gen Clark apparently told two prominent Republicans: "I would have been a Republican, if Karl Rove had returned my phone calls."
Challenged by Newsweek, Gen Clark insisted his remarks were merely a "humorous tweak".
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: brushoff; chose; clark; democrats; house; wesleyclark; white
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
1
posted on
09/22/2003 7:07:13 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
Clark needs a spokesperson that gives all his interviews,remarks, speeches,debates.He should just shut up and smile.He is a dunce!
2
posted on
09/22/2003 7:12:24 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: blam
"Karl, pickup it's Wes"
"Karl...I know you're there...Pick up! It's Wes"
"dammit Karl...Pick up!"
3
posted on
09/22/2003 7:12:54 PM PDT
by
UNGN
(I've been here since '98 but had nothing to say until now)
To: blam
liar liar liar
4
posted on
09/22/2003 7:12:57 PM PDT
by
finnman69
(!)
To: blam
White house records show no attempt on the part of Clark to contact Carl Rove. Game over.
5
posted on
09/22/2003 7:13:11 PM PDT
by
meyer
To: blam
Ooooh yeah. We have a lot to fear from this yutz. He'll be lucky to poll 2% at this gaffe a minute rate.
To: blam
A great example of "addition by subtraction." The Clark reminds me of an old beast named Crowe. But I believe that Clark is less intelligent and less trustworthy.
7
posted on
09/22/2003 7:14:36 PM PDT
by
185JHP
( "This Train don't carry no scammers - no AlSharptons, no midnight ramblers - This Train.")
To: blam
Another "Hinbenberg Moment" for dwarf number 10..
To: blam
--A furious Gen Clark apparently told two prominent Republicans: "I would have been a Republican, if Karl Rove had returned my phone calls." --
LOL, the democrats embrace this whiner.
9
posted on
09/22/2003 7:16:43 PM PDT
by
fml
To: gov_bean_ counter
Another "Hinbenberg Moment" for dwarf number 10.Another "Al Gore Moment" is what came into my mind. What's next, is Clark going to claim he invented the US Army?
10
posted on
09/22/2003 7:17:56 PM PDT
by
CFC__VRWC
(AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - don't liberals just kill ya?)
To: CFC__VRWC
I was sorta refering to the going down in flames... That this guy could have made 4 star is not a good reflection on the military, IMHO. Where's the integrity? Can he even spell honor?
To: blam
A furious Gen Clark apparently told two prominent Republicans: "I would have been a Republican, if Karl Rove had returned my phone calls." Except FOX News reported today that:
- The White House call log shows no such call ever coming from Clark; and
- Rove has no memory of ever receiving such a call.
12
posted on
09/22/2003 7:21:00 PM PDT
by
martin_fierro
(Great Googlymoogly!)
To: blam
Where have we heard this story before? Perot was supposed to have been rebuffed by GHW Bush & wasn't given a job in his admintration. To get even the little big eared pr*ck gave the election to clinton. I believe Perot did it but I can't say I believe this tale of Clark's.
13
posted on
09/22/2003 7:24:29 PM PDT
by
Ditter
To: blam
14
posted on
09/22/2003 7:24:33 PM PDT
by
mikeb704
To: gov_bean_ counter
I was sorta refering to the going down in flames... That this guy could have made 4 star is not a good reflection on the military, IMHO. Where's the integrity? Can he even spell honor?I got you now. I still, however, do hold onto my Al Gore comparison. General Clark does seem to be very truth-challenged.
Unfortunately, the military is very much like many private corporations in that, while there are some people who make it to the top ranks of management on actual accomplishments, there are at least as many who make it on nothing more than their ability to kiss ass and backstab their rivals.
15
posted on
09/22/2003 7:27:59 PM PDT
by
CFC__VRWC
(AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - don't liberals just kill ya?)
To: blam
The lib/dems and Clark deserve each other. He fits right into their "no integrity" agenda. Good luck to all of them. ROTFLMAO
16
posted on
09/22/2003 7:28:28 PM PDT
by
mrtysmm
To: blam
That is b.s. pure and simple.
The clintons own clark body and soul. He is a whooly owned subsidy of the clinton crime cartel.
If clark was a vehicle, the clintons name would be on the title.
If he was a house or a piece of real estate, the clintons name would be on the deed.
clark is nothing but a piece of property of the clinton crime machine and their bidding and their bidding alone will he do.
17
posted on
09/22/2003 7:34:48 PM PDT
by
sport
To: MEG33
That sounds like Hillary. He could also get several ghost writers to write his books.
To: blam
Clark is a four-star General. If I remember correctly, an officer of that rank can be recalled into the active service at any time, even after they have "retired."
The Bush adminstration should call General Wes back into active duty and post him to northern Alaska. D.E.W. line. That will shut him up.
To: FreeAtlanta
How could I forget ghostwriter for books!
20
posted on
09/22/2003 7:46:34 PM PDT
by
MEG33
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson