To: AndyTheBear
This is a pile of lies - it's just NOT possible that Bush could be beaten with somebody with only 10% name recognition in national polls!
18 posted on
09/22/2003 5:44:36 PM PDT by
Pubbie
("Last time I checked, he doesn't have a vote" - Tom DeLay on Ari Fleischer's demand for Tax-Rebates)
To: Pubbie
Clark has a strange quality - the more people will see of him, the less they will want to see of him.
Regardless, Bush & Co haven't done much to respond to criticsm the dems have been firing his way since Spring. He has to fight back - I'm glad this is Sept 2003, not Sept 2004!
21 posted on
09/22/2003 5:47:33 PM PDT by
HitmanLV
(I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
To: Pubbie
Why not? "Unnamed Democrat" does better than the actual candidates in head-to-head matchups, and if 90% of the people don't know anything about Clark, he has essentially become "Unnamed Democrat."
His numbers will go down when people start noticing the actual guy hiding behind the resume. He's an awful candidate.
To: Pubbie
it's just NOT possible that Bush could be beaten with somebody with only 10% name recognition in national polls! the poll cited put his name recognition at about 75% i believe. you can check online.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson