Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
The Commission allows only three shots.

One missed, hit the curb twenty feet from the underpass, and the ricochet cut James Tague's cheek.

The damage to the curb was patched with darker material, preventing analysis of residue.

Tague had filmed the nick, after which his home was burgled and the film was the only item taken.

[Decker, too, photographed the nick, and the FBI kept the negatives it took from him.]

Tague was surprised by Liebeler asking about the film, because it was not public that he'd taken it.

The FBI recommended examination by a building materials specialist which is included along with the above information in Harold Weisberg, Case Open, Carroll & Graf, 1994, Chapter XIII, pages 135-166.

Unfortunately for the Warren Commission version, three shots cannot account for the known effects:

A missed shot;

A Kennedy head shot;

A Kennedy back shot without exit, one finger digit deep per autopsists;

A Magic Bullet causing seven wounds including two in bone, leaving Commission Exhibit 399 missing only the two grains carved from its base for NAA testing purposes.

Add various missed shots in the turf, one by the manhole, the windshield--

Not to mention the throat wound which was described as a wound of entry--

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain; he works for the Wizard Commission.

197 posted on 09/29/2003 8:13:01 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]


To: PhilDragoo
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain; he works for the Wizard Commission.
-phil-

What is really amazing about these discussions is the absolute zealotry of the Warren Commissions defenders.

It's hard to imagine what they 'get' out of attempting to justify the governments near TOTAL foul up of this case.

It was apparent from the initial media reports that Oswald was being set up as the lone gunman. I read everything I could get my hands on back in '64, prior to the Report, and finally got a copy hot off the presses..
I, and millions of other interested citizens read the report & immediately wrote our newspapers, outlining the same infantile errors in fact and logic that we still point out today.

Back then there were few apologists for the report.
I find it weird that there are now so many here at FR, -- on a site dedicated in part to rooting out government fraud.
Apparently, the big lie principle is working well.
199 posted on 09/29/2003 8:48:02 PM PDT by tpaine ( I'm trying to be Mr Nice Guy, but politics keep getting in me way. ArnieRino for Governator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson