To: OXENinFLA
Regulatoion rather than a fat ban would seem to be more appropriate. I think a ban can be justified only if there is real danger of someone raising a private army and equipping it with .50s. These things ARE pretty fearsome.
14 posted on
09/22/2003 3:08:55 PM PDT by
RobbyS
(nd)
To: RobbyS
Welp, you can't stop tanks with a .22.
As to a ban itself.....the 2nd Amendment prohibits any such infringement.
But when did the law ever matter to the power-hungry?
15 posted on
09/22/2003 7:04:02 PM PDT by
INVAR
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson