Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OXENinFLA
Regulatoion rather than a fat ban would seem to be more appropriate. I think a ban can be justified only if there is real danger of someone raising a private army and equipping it with .50s. These things ARE pretty fearsome.
14 posted on 09/22/2003 3:08:55 PM PDT by RobbyS (nd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS
Welp, you can't stop tanks with a .22.

As to a ban itself.....the 2nd Amendment prohibits any such infringement.

But when did the law ever matter to the power-hungry?
15 posted on 09/22/2003 7:04:02 PM PDT by INVAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson