Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First power station to harness moon opens
New Scientist ^ | 09/22/03 | Danny Penman

Posted on 09/22/2003 11:38:47 AM PDT by bedolido

The first commercial subsea power station to harness the tidal currents of the sea was hooked up to an electricity grid on Saturday.

The rise and fall of the sea, caused by the moon's gravitational tug on the Earth, could be generating electricity for hundreds of thousands of homes within five years if the new Norwegian power station proves successful.

The power station, which resembles an underwater windmill, began generating electricity for the town of Hammerfest. Although still largely a prototype, the generator is the first in the world to harness the power of the sea and be connected to an electricity grid.

The tidal mill produces 300-kilowatts of electricity - enough to power 30 Norwegian houses or 60-80 British homes. Its designers hope to begin mass producing the devices within two years.

"Within a year we will have learnt enough to build a second generation device, says Bjorn Bekken, project manager for Hammerfest Stroem, the company that built the device. "I hope to see underwater energy farms within five years."

Professor Ian Fells of the University of Newcastle, says that tidal power has "enormous potential" despite costing more than wind power, another renewable resource.

"There's still a lot of hard engineering required before the costs will come down but we are going to need all of the renewables and nuclear power we can get our hands on if we are going to meet our Kyoto commitments," he told New Scientist.

Near continuous source

The device harnesses the tidal energy of the sea in the same way windmills tap into the power of air currents. The generator consists of ten metre diameter blades which rotate as water passes over them. These in turn drive a generator to produce electricity. The whole mechanism is held aloft by a 20 metre steel column anchored to the seabed.

If the first generation device proves successful, the company envisages installing up to 20 tidal mills off the coast of Hammerfest. After that they hope to begin mass producing them for the international market.

Tidal mills have the potential to provide vast amounts of energy. The European Commission estimates the currents around the UK, for example, could produce 48-terrawatt hours of electricity per year. The Commission has identified 106 potential sites around Europe, 42 of them off the coast of the UK including the islands and lochs of western Scotland, the Orkney and Shetland Islands and the Channel Islands.

Tidal energy has one key advantage over other renewable forms of power - it has the potential to provide a near continuous source of power 24 hours a day. Wave, wind and solar power all fluctuate throughout the day. By contrast, the tide flows continuously in one direction for just over 12 hours before pausing briefly and then reversing.

This means that tidal power has the potential to make a significant contribution to the baseload - the minimum amount of electricity needed by a country and usually provided by coal and nuclear power plants.

Hammerfest Stroem, which is backed by the oil firm Statoil and the engineering company ABB, estimates that mass production will lower the cost of tidal power to that of wind which costs about 3-6 pence per unit.

Danny Penman


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; harness; moon; power; station; tidalpower
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: Willie Green
What's the difference between British homes and those in Norwegia?

It is a hell of a lot colder in Norwegia.

41 posted on 09/22/2003 12:20:26 PM PDT by Hacksaw (Toomey '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Actually the moon is getting farther away due to tidal forces. Can't do the math myself, but I've been hearing this for a long time.

Then it is supposed to get closer and eventually break up into fragments. By then, I expect us to have a Dysonsphere.

42 posted on 09/22/2003 12:23:09 PM PDT by Hacksaw (Toomey '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TomHarkinIsNotFromIowa
OK, I remember the concept now. The energy to boost the moon into higher orbit is supplied by the earth's rotation, which is slowing down. It is a simple transer of energy, not magic. So now some genius needs to answer the question -- will tapping the tidal energy increase or diminish this effect?
43 posted on 09/22/2003 12:24:35 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Stirner
I had heard that once the moon gets far enough away, the pole will randomly wander about (over long periods of time - like Mars), and things could happen like Antartica being on the equator.

Estimated time 50 billion years.

Isn't the Sun estimated to go red giant in 4 billion years?

44 posted on 09/22/2003 12:27:58 PM PDT by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
Must have been from Canadia.

No, Jimmy was pure blue-collar Irish Catholic Pittsburgher.
He was a few years older than the rest of us because he had done a stint as an MP in Pleiku during Tet when he graduated HS.

45 posted on 09/22/2003 12:28:36 PM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
What's the difference between British homes and those in Norwegia?

Weather - pure and simple and the cost to keep homes warm. The British Isles benefit from the Gulf Stream bringing warmer waters and thus generally warmer weather. While this is also somewhat true for the western coast of Norway, the benefit is just not as great.

Average temperatures in Oslo, Norway:

AVERAGE TEMPERATURE °C
January -7
February -7
March -2
April 3
May 9
June 14
July 15
August 14
September 9
October 5
November -1
December -5

Average Temperature for London, England,UK:

AVERAGE TEMPERATURE °C
January 4
February 4
March 6
April 8
May 12
June 15
July 17
August 17
September 14
October 11
November 7
December 5

46 posted on 09/22/2003 12:28:42 PM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
I'm sure the enviromentalists will decide that these stations would take homes away from some protected species in the ocean.
47 posted on 09/22/2003 12:29:50 PM PDT by honeygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Apparently they use half as much electricity.
48 posted on 09/22/2003 12:30:46 PM PDT by honeygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
The British live in a warmer climate, so less heating costs.

That, and, of course, the British are famous for cold houses and warm beer.

Or as a distant relative of mine put it, "Sure, we like our beer room temperature, but do you have any idea how cold that is [in England]?"

49 posted on 09/22/2003 12:34:43 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
The British live in a warmer climate, so less heating costs.

That, and, of course, the British are famous for cold houses and warm beer.

Or as a distant relative of mine put it, "Sure, we like our beer room temperature, but do you have any idea how cold that is [in England]?"

50 posted on 09/22/2003 12:34:54 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freeeee; HEY4QDEMS
Thanks for this information. Very interesting if true.

In my analysis (such as it was) I was assuming that tidal power is drawn from the Moon's velocity, and, therefore, its transfer from the Moon to the generating station acts to slow the moon down. As the moon slows down it has to draw closer to the earth (to return to earth from space, a spacecraft fires its rockets to slow down, that's why they're called "retro-rockets").

If the Moon is drawing away from Earth, there must be a source adding energy to it. Unless I misunderstood (or have forgotten) freshman physics.

(steely)

51 posted on 09/22/2003 12:36:22 PM PDT by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
Finally a way to win an election for a super majority. The splinelesss RNC can't do it alone.
52 posted on 09/22/2003 12:36:40 PM PDT by bmwcyle (Here's to Hillary's book sinking like the Clinton 2000 economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
LOL
53 posted on 09/22/2003 12:36:45 PM PDT by honeygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
Huh?

How does the moon "know" that we're using that energy? The "stolen" energy will not come from the moon; it'll come from weather patterns. The probable result will be that Norway will be in a year-round state of cold, clammy, damp-but-not-actually-raining weather.

Also known as "English."
54 posted on 09/22/2003 12:38:13 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
BTW, -7 Celsius converts to 19.4 Fahrenheit. Notice the avg. temperatures in London never get below freezing, even in the winter.
55 posted on 09/22/2003 12:39:02 PM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
You forgot font color red.

We're all gonna die!!!!

56 posted on 09/22/2003 12:39:18 PM PDT by ASA Vet (1st Vietnam KIA: ASA Sp/4 James T. Davis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Isn't Norwegia right next to Swedeborgia?
57 posted on 09/22/2003 12:39:34 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TomHarkinIsNotFromIowa
"Hope this helps. "

One more time. This time do the "...for Dummies" version. :)
58 posted on 09/22/2003 12:41:09 PM PDT by honeygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
>>The moon is slowly moving away from the Earth, not towards it.
>It's probably trying to get away from the second hand smoke.

So wait, if we weaken the angular momentum of the moon, and pull the moon closer, we can save the Earth from losing its moon! Cool!

(Actually, gravity is the only force affecting the moon. Angular momentum is not a force, and cannot be transmitted or dampened from the Earth to the moon.)
59 posted on 09/22/2003 12:41:55 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dangus
I would also venture a guess that heating efficiency would have something to do with it.
60 posted on 09/22/2003 12:42:57 PM PDT by Teacher317 (just being straight here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson