Replies

That's actually a very good question and it should be addressed. When Terri had her nutrition halted before, her siblings went to the facility where she was and started questioning nurses and doctors if they could try spoon-feeding her. Questions, mind you. They did nothing more.

Well, they nearly ended up in jail and both were barred for six months afterwards. That was for asking if they could try baby food with Terri.

Now, those of you reading this, please keep in mind that the "husband" and his lawyer do not want Terri fed by spoon because of the fear that she will not properly handle soft foods or fluids and aspirate them, causing complications. However, they have no problem forcing her to dehydrate to death.

Screwy little set of personal concerns, wouldn't you say?

Barring her own siblings. If that isn't heartless...

Honestly, I don't see how the Schindler's can stand up to this tyranny in a "free country." The American people approved of "Schindler's List," but they seem uninterested in saving another "Schindler" from starvation! I question the values of our people from FL to CA, from ME to HI and the points in-between.

Barring her own siblings from visiting her, after ASKING the doctors about spoon feeding Terri as a possibility?
I truly think Hell has a special wing for these bastards. They had one built. Michael Schaivo will be in a constant state of starvation, and Felos will be mute, and subjected to the screaming medusa 24 hours a day for eternity....