[max_rpf]

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Most if not all of the ACLU & Co's anti-religion action is based off of the fact that individuals in the govnerment are acting in support of any one religion (e.g. 10 Commandments Monument or a school board not cancelling a religious holiday).

Ignoring that this new interpretation of the Establishment clause is wrong, just how is this judge linking the private action of parents and school children to the government. This is the very definition of tyranny.

[A. Pole]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Bump.