Replies

The guilt that comes from knowingly supporting war crimes in print.

Srebrenica was a mass war crime where thousands (certainly less than the 7000 claimed, but certainly more than 5,000) of males between the ages of "military aged males"--that is, males between the ages of 12 and 92--were gathered together, had their hands tied behind their backs, had their eyes covered with hoods, and had their brains blown out, one by one, by execution squads. Except for one memorable spot where they stuffed more than 1000 of them in a barn and machinegunned them to death. The Bosnian Serb Army then carried out two coverup operations: the first one immediately after the executions, where the dead were buried in "primary" mass graves, and then several months later, where the same units, using earth moving equipment, moved the bodies from the primary mass graves to several dozen secondary mass graves.

(The other 2000 or so were killed by Bosnian Serb soldiers in the field trying to escape from Potocari--a despicable act, but technically not a war crime.)

Joan and Destro and their sock puppets are aware of this, and have been spending months if not years claiming that it never happened, nobody saw the Serbs did it, and besides, the Muslims that they killed this way somehow "deserved" it. And they're enraged that Americans had to show up and spoil the fun. Look up their past posts and read for yourself.

A man who claims the Muslims "deserved" it at Srebrenica is a moral clone of a man who claims the Jews "deserved" it at Babi Yar. There is complete, utter and absolute moral identity between the two outlooks.