Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Real Reagan
Time Online ^ | Sunday September 21, 2003 | Michael Duffy & Nancy Gibbs

Posted on 09/21/2003 7:01:44 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi

The Real Reagan

Think you know what made him tick? His letters may surprise you

By MICHAEL DUFFY AND NANCY GIBBS

Sunday, Sep. 21, 2003

Ronald Reagan remains the unsolved mystery of modern American politics, breaking rules, defying odds and confounding even people who knew him well and watched him up close. His biographer Edmund Morris described him as "an apparent airhead," not just unknown but unknowable, a man who slept through meetings, read from scripts, mistook anecdotes for analysis and prepared for a summit by watching The Sound of Music. His heirs and allies defend him as the redeeming visionary of the latter 20th century, a man who invited people to underestimate him because it served his purposes. As for the private man, he was portrayed as a cold, remote performance artist, and as a humane and generous soul; columnist James Reston called him "an authentic phony"; to George Will, he was "an open book who read himself to the country."

Future scholars may argue with the substance of Reagan's principles but not with their pedigree, for now they will have a paper trail of the kind historians can only dream. It was his Vice President, George Herbert Walker Bush, who was famous for the thank-you notes he flecked off in every direction. But few people knew that Reagan ranks among the most prolific Presidents, author of more than 5,000 letters on everything from his love of Snoopy to his guilt about sex, his hatred of gossip and his taste for Ayn Rand. And so the private account of a public life, to be published in Reagan: A Life in Letters, is a code breaker for anyone still curious about which version most resembles the Real Reagan.

The letters are easy, intimate; but to read them is to wonder if they are an extension of his personal relationships or a substitute for them. He began his public life as a radio announcer, talking to an audience he could not see; he went on as a movie star to delight an audience he never met. But the fans would write letters, and he would write back. In the case of Lorraine Wagner, Reagan fan-club president, Philadelphia chapter, there were some 150 letters over the course of 50 years. As his political following grew, the conversation continued, and there was remarkably little difference in tone and tenderness in his letters to his fans, his children and the leaders of other superpowers.

The letters suggest a man for whom writing was less a habit than a need, like food and water, as though the very act shaped his thoughts as much as the thoughts shaped the writing. Reagan didn't type; he wrote by hand in blue or black ink on a yellow legal pad or dictated for his secretaries to transcribe, and so the drafts were often saved, stuffed into a box and then forgotten. In 1996 Kiron Skinner, now a professor at Carnegie Mellon, was researching a book on the end of the cold war when she stumbled on the first batch. As she dug a little deeper, more boxes appeared. Overwhelmed by the sheer volume, she called in Martin Anderson, who served as Reagan's first domestic-policy adviser, and his wife Annelise, a Reagan aide at the Office of Management and Budget, to help. First there were 1,000 letters, then 3,000, and in the end the trio sorted through more than 5,000, and suspect there are an additional 3,000 or 4,000 out there still unaccounted for—until they turn up on eBay.

Reagan was called the great communicator, and that was usually meant to describe the way he spoke. But it may be that one secret to his success, his ability to persuade people, was that he took his beliefs more seriously than he took himself. Spelling and grammar errors aside, the prose is literate, not literary; he does not seem to try to make an impression with shiny turns of phrase. He stays out of the way of the arguments he is making, and in his asides and self-deprecation, there is the verbal version of that little duck of the head, the modest gesture that says, "This isn't about me. This is about things that matter more than both of us."

Among the people he persuaded, if you believe the Bush gospels, is his Vice President's eldest son. One of the odd plot twists of George W. Bush's presidency is his claim to be more Reagan's heir than Poppy's. This is, among other things, an advantage when it comes to appealing to a Republican base that likes its populism meaty, its tax cuts nonnegotiable, its foreign policy undiplomatic, in strict black and white. Before there was any "axis of evil," there was the "evil empire." There are more hard-line Reaganauts in the second Bush White House than there were in the first; Bush's staff, his rhetoric, his world view, his habits, his virtues and faults, all give rise to descriptions of this as Reagan's third term. And so the principles that emerge from Reagan's letters provide not only a source book for a past presidency but also a guide to a present one.

It has always been tempting to compare the two men, especially since the Bush shop keeps a 24-hour honor guard around the Reagan flame. The letters remind us that Bush and Reagan both rose as Governors of big states; both are Westerners to the core, vigorous, unabashed, plainspoken and dismissed as incurious. They were bracketed by tinkerers and tacticians: Carter, Bush pere and Clinton all worked the margins, looked for an opening. Reagan and Bush are by contrast radicals, risk takers, playing for keeps. It's almost part of the conservative catechism: Bush, as Reagan did, conveys the sense that he has had a full life apart from his political fortunes; both men give the impression that they could have run and lost and been content back at the ranch with their beloved wives, clearing brush, chopping wood, moving on. So with nothing to lose, they play for the whole table: overhaul the tax code, topple the evil empire, save the world from terrorism. Why settle for less?

While Bush is widely seen as one of the most genuinely devout modern Presidents, Reagan was sometimes charged with being a phony, one who talked up religious values but was actually a divorced, nonchurchgoing Hollywood type who was remote from his own kids. He tells one pen pal that he would go to church more if he could, but the Secret Service argued that because of terrorism threats he presented too big a risk to other parishioners. Yet elsewhere, Reagan sounds better equipped to lead a congregation than join one. In a 1978 letter, he argues with a California pastor about the divinity of Jesus: "(E)ither he was what he said he was or he was the world's greatest liar. It is impossible for me to believe a liar or charlatan could have had the effect on mankind that he has had for 2000 years. We could ask, would even the greatest of liars carry his lie through the crucifixion, when a simple confession would have saved him? ... Did he allow us the choice you say that you and others have made, to believe in his teaching but reject his statements about his own identity?"

The letters counsel humility to journalists and scholars alike, by revealing how little we know in real time about what goes on in the White House. Reagan emerges as a much more hands-on President than many of his aides—and their sometimes self-promoting memoirs—suggested. While recuperating from a gunshot wound in 1981, Reagan sat down in the White House solarium and drafted a four-page letter to Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev, appealing to the their common humanity to reduce tensions between the two countries. The letter is genuine, heartfelt—and sublimely idealistic. When he showed it to top aides, they blanched; Presidents did not send such personal appeals right off the bat, they said. Reagan and his aides went back and forth for days; at one point, the State Department was given the job of writing an alternative letter. In the end, however, Reagan made sure that both letters were sent.

If there were those who found Reagan inscrutable, there will be many who find his letters guileless. In mid-1981, under attack for not laying out his foreign policy, Reagan writes a friend, "I have a foreign policy; I'm working on it. I just don't happen to think it's wise to always stand up and put in quotation marks in front of the world what your foreign policy is." Five years later, on his return from the Reykjavik summit, Reagan sounds a bit frustrated that the Soviets aren't buying his promise to share Star Wars technology in exchange for a reduction in all offensive missiles. "I have never entertained a thought that sdi could be a bargaining chip. I did tell Gorbachev that if and when we had such a system ... we'd share such a defense with them. I don't think he believes me."

Since Reagan left office, there has been an abiding frustration among his most loyal supporters that he was seen, as Democratic power broker Clark Clifford described him, as "an amiable dunce." These letters, compiled with the help of two of his aides and approved by his wife, are published in part to polish Reagan's image in the twilight of his life. (Reagan, 92, suffers from Alzheimer's disease and made his last public statement in a farewell letter in 1994.)

That helps explain why this Life in Letters has its gaps. There is little here about his mother Nelle, even less about his difficult, alcoholic father Jack, and the book skips past his first marriage to Jane Wyman altogether. Reagan was carefully courting public opinion long before he became President, and as any good politician can appreciate, that is a campaign that never ends.

From the Sep. 29, 2003 issue of TIME magazine


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alifeinletters; bookreview; letters; reagan; ronaldreagan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
The libs are proven wrong about this great man, but still take shots at him and W.

Shameless.

1 posted on 09/21/2003 7:01:44 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
I am looking forward to reading these letters in more detail.
2 posted on 09/21/2003 7:11:52 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (214.2 (-85.8) Homestretch to 200)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
"His biographer Edmund Morris described him as 'an apparent airhead,'"

Obviously, the authors of this article did not do their homework. If they did, then they wouldn't have misquoted Morris. Anyone who has read "Dutch", or even "Slander", knows that, while that was Morris's anticipated first-impression, he thought that Reagan was anything but an airhead.

It is irksome how the snobs at Time feel the need to thrown in lines about spelling and grammatical errors. Unlike "brilliant" Democrats like Gore, who get Ds at Harvard and flunk out of Divinity and Law School.
3 posted on 09/21/2003 7:20:50 AM PDT by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
"Bush, as Reagan did, conveys the sense that he has had a full life apart from his political fortunes; both men give the impression that they could have run and lost and been content back at the ranch with their beloved wives, clearing brush, chopping wood, moving on. So with nothing to lose, they play for the whole table: overhaul the tax code, topple the evil empire, save the world from terrorism. Why settle for less? "

And in this, both were like George Washington, who, during his presidency, wanted little more than to get his job done well and return home to Mount Vernon.

4 posted on 09/21/2003 7:23:36 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I hear the one called "Reagan: In His Own Hand" by Kiron Skinner is good too...watched the interview with the author about the book on booknotes.org archive.
5 posted on 09/21/2003 7:26:50 AM PDT by Johnbalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
I have read some of the letters and drafts at the Reagan Presidental Library. The wordings and phrasings are such beyond my writing ability. This man had a clear mind and knows just what he wants to say. Some were very eloquent!

As for his "sleeping" at meetings. Reagan at the end of a weekly cabinet meeting, all started to file out of the room, Reagan looked up and said, "Harry, please stay behind. I want to talk to you!" Then he repeated verbatium of what was said at the meeting, and wanted to know what is to be done about it! Sleeping he wasn't, he just closed his eyes and listened to everything!

6 posted on 09/21/2003 7:30:20 AM PDT by Sen Jack S. Fogbound (Let's go to Mars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Johnbalaya
I just finished reading "Reagan's War", his 50 year battle against communism. I am finally convinced he was a great president. I'm sorry I didn't recognize that when he was in office. Hopefully we will some day have as many Ronald Reagan Boulevards in American cities as there are MLK Boulevards.

If Bush is following Reagans lead then he is playing his hand close to his vest and only sharing the information that is required to keep the media dogs off of his back.

Cheers:
7 posted on 09/21/2003 7:51:27 AM PDT by Parawan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Parawan
Hopefully we will some day have as many Ronald Reagan Boulevards in American cities as there are MLK Boulevards.

And hopefully in nicer neighborhoods.

8 posted on 09/21/2003 7:53:44 AM PDT by dead (Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
12th Commandment: Always post a Reagan pic on a Reagan FR thread.


9 posted on 09/21/2003 7:57:26 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (EEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
This Time article is a load of crappola!

George Shultz was interviewed about the tensions between the Soviet Union and the US when Reagan assumed the Presidency. The NSA had intercepted cables from the Soviets that depicted Reagan as a bumbling cowboy, but bellicose towards nuclear war. I believe it was broadcast on the Discovery Channel.

Reagan listened to the analysis, repeated, that the Soviets thought he was "bent on global war" and "crazy or stupid." In front of all the assembled agencies and military aides, he said: "Good! I want them to think that!

In any case, that interview always reminded me of the funniest Saturday Night Live sketches I ever saw. In front of the cameras, the Reagan character acted like a amiable Forrest Gump, and when the door closed, he started speaking in Farsi and masterminding combat tactics.

10 posted on 09/21/2003 8:09:10 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I like Bush, but Im sorry, he is no Reagan.
11 posted on 09/21/2003 8:17:13 AM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Ronald Wilson Reagan
Quotes on Taxes

Republicans believe every day is 4th of July, but Democrats believe every day is April 15.

We don't have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven't taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much.

Welfare's purpose should be to eliminate, as far as possible, the need for its own existence.

[G]overnment's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.

Government is the people's business and every man, woman and child becomes a shareholder with the first penny of tax paid.

More Ronald Reagan Quotes Here.

12 posted on 09/21/2003 8:19:40 AM PDT by Varmint Al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
As for his "sleeping" at meetings. Reagan at the end of a weekly cabinet meeting, all started to file out of the room, Reagan looked up and said, "Harry, please stay behind. I want to talk to you!" Then he repeated verbatium of what was said at the meeting, and wanted to know what is to be done about it! Sleeping he wasn't, he just closed his eyes and listened to everything!

My favorite Saturday Night Live skit involving Reagan had, I think, Phil Hartman as Reagan. When he was with only his close aids he was a detail driven powerhouse, pushing his people to their limits with his knowledge and forceful personality. When a member of the public would show up, such as a visiting Girl Scout troop or a friend like Jimmy Stewart he'd lapse into the slow, somewhat stumbling caricature most comedians tried to push of Reagan. As soon as the door closed on the outsider it was like a light switch flipped and back to top of his game commander.

I think they thought it was a riot to suggest that such a fantasy about Reagan was possible. I think we may find that they had it more right than they thought.

By the way, as I write this it's getting to the conclusion of High Noon on AMC (the clock is striking 12). I know that President Bush has said this is his favortie movie. I have a feeling President Reagan liked it. I know both of them understood its meaning.

13 posted on 09/21/2003 8:32:56 AM PDT by Phsstpok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
C O V E R
The Real Reagan
Think you know what made him tick? His letters may surprise you
By MICHAEL DUFFY AND NANCY GIBBS

RONALD REAGAN LIBRARY
SCRIBE: Reagan writes at Camp David in 1984, but his sweater says he’d rather be in Philly

 

 

Link to Time Page

14 posted on 09/21/2003 8:42:16 AM PDT by Varmint Al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
I took note of that too. Apparently, TIME believes that citizen-Presidents of the kind envisioned by the Founders are somehow inferior to professional politicians. That's another clue to where TIME'S collective head has been inserted.
15 posted on 09/21/2003 8:57:01 AM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Varmint Al
Notice the hand-made afghan on the arm of the couch in that photo? I wonder who crocheted it.
16 posted on 09/21/2003 9:19:59 AM PDT by snopercod (I'm stranded all alone in the gas station of love and have to use the self-service pumps - Wierd Al)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Varmint Al; All
OHH Al maybe Nancy???




I think Time Magazine is bunch of airheads

They think Ronnie is airhead SHUT UP DUDE


I was kinda shock that according to Time Magazine there was no writing evidence on him writing to first wife Jane Wyman maybe those letters are lost
17 posted on 09/21/2003 9:23:21 AM PDT by SevenofNine (Not everybody in it for truth, justice, and the American way=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: potlatch
Rousing RR Ping!
18 posted on 09/21/2003 12:01:39 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
Apparently the liberals feel it's time to start "de-constructing" Reagan and his legacy. How else are they going to build up Slick's legacy without first destroying (or at least tarnishing a little) Reagan's?
19 posted on 09/21/2003 12:40:42 PM PDT by Maria S (“I know a little bit about how White Houses work.” Hillary Clinton, 8/26/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
My friend, over the summer, helped the person putting these letters together.
20 posted on 09/21/2003 1:16:08 PM PDT by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson