[WaterDragon]

Sounds like Clark would be a worse case of loose-cannon-on-deck than Clinton, if such a thing were possible! No wonder Clinton backs him. They are equally stupid and arrogant Rhodes Scholars, without a shred of common sense or decency.

[USNBandit]

You are correct. Clinton did all the wrong things for all the wrong reasons. Clinton's biggest interest seemed to be writing himself a place in history.

Clark is an egomaniac with such a loose grip on reality that he thinks he should be president. He is a lot more dangerous. If he got elected, can you imagine how screwed up any military campaign would be. He would micro-manage the whole thing from the White House, and he is no military genius.