Skip to comments.
NYSE SENDS SOS (ex-Clintonista Rubin declines Grasso's job)
NY POST ^
| September 20, 2003
| JENNY ANDERSON
Posted on 09/20/2003 2:18:56 AM PDT by Liz
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:16:50 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The NYSE Board moved to get out ahead of its loud and angry critics yesterday, appointing a search committee to find an interim chairman, exchange officials said.
But that didn't stop NYSE members from continuing to call for the ouster of the board's compensation committee and to press for more information about former Chairman Dick Grasso's severance.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Extended News
KEYWORDS: grasso; nyse; rubin
1
posted on
09/20/2003 2:18:56 AM PDT
by
Liz
To: Liz
And why should anyone trust the NYSE Board that has run this debacle? Every last one of the compensation committee ought to be replaced at the very least. When Enron, World Com, Tyco et al were fleecing the stock-owning public, the NYSE Board was either asleep at the switch, or knowingly passive. They need to be fined for dereliction of duty and fired. Then we can move on to firing all the members of the SEC, who proved to be incompetent in regulating the NYSE or anything else they were supposed to do. What a worthless lot! Stockholders ought to have been much more vocal when having their retirement accounts looted by corporate crooks with connections to the agencies who were supposed to be regulating them. What a rotten system.
To: kittymyrib
When Enron, World Com, Tyco et al were fleecing the stock-owning public, the NYSE Board was either asleep at the switch, or knowingly passive. Passive? No way. That was about the time Grasso was padding his perks.
3
posted on
09/20/2003 3:11:54 AM PDT
by
Liz
To: Liz
Hah, no way could Rubin withstand the public scrutiny if he accepted the job.
4
posted on
09/20/2003 4:39:00 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
To: OldFriend
>> Hah, no way could Rubin withstand the public scrutiny if he accepted the job.
I was thinking exactly the same thing. Rubin is a con-man.
To: Liz
Now that arrests are on the horizon it's clear that Grasso was no longer effective. Time for a new hack!
Imagine the kind of person will be chosen by the likes of Madame Halfbright!
6
posted on
09/20/2003 4:55:14 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
To: Liz
Rumblings started last May about Grasso's pay, and it has taken this long for whom ever it was that wanted him out to get rid of him.
There is no way the whole story is out on what went on and is going on in the money pit. Grasso sure must have tick someone off.
8
posted on
09/20/2003 5:18:21 AM PDT
by
StriperSniper
(The slippery slope is getting steeper.)
To: OldFriend
I shudder to think who Mad Maddy will come up with (shudder).
9
posted on
09/20/2003 6:30:40 AM PDT
by
Liz
To: OldFriend; PhilipFreneau
....no way could Rubin withstand the public scrutiny if he accepted the job....... Main reason why he declined it, no doubt.
10
posted on
09/20/2003 6:32:40 AM PDT
by
Liz
To: Just mythoughts
The big payoff is make sure that Grasso doesn't write a book.
But then he must know that if he tells all he will get to go to a picnic in Ft. Marcy Park.
11
posted on
09/20/2003 7:53:58 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
To: OldFriend
Tend to agree, considering the known players and can only imagine the hidden ones.
However, heard enough from a few who are known to have ethics outraged over what is unfolding, not sure how they will be quieten.
There is a thought that this has something to do with creating the "Hoover economy" that we keep hearing the socialists accusing Bush for. (Note Hillary is the first to use that phrase and old Wesley Clark used that phrase in his speech the other day.)
To: Liz
We don't need no NYSE when we've got e-Bay.
13
posted on
09/20/2003 8:18:12 AM PDT
by
bvw
(We're not done the war on terror until WE hold every oilfield and every strategic canal and harbor.)
To: bvw
Heheh......nice zinger.
14
posted on
09/20/2003 8:42:09 AM PDT
by
Liz
To: Liz
Should be so. Not e-bay (jealous I am of their size and rigteously angry at some of their policies) but the *RIGHT* to hold and run public internet auctions of bearable paper contracts and financial securities.
Why does a TIAA-CREF, a Vanguard or a Fidelity need an exchange anyway -- a lot of trades are intra-house.
15
posted on
09/20/2003 8:55:43 AM PDT
by
bvw
(We're not done the war on terror until WE hold every oilfield and every strategic canal and harbor.)
To: bvw
The original intent of the NYSE was a a quasi-regulatory agency. One of the beefs about Grasso was that as a regulator he got too close to the companies he was supposed to be overseeing. His bigtime cash-out was seen as unseemly for a "regulator."
16
posted on
09/20/2003 9:09:05 AM PDT
by
Liz
To: Liz
Right. They don't allow -- or didn't allow -- a stock with multiple classes and had requirments as the minimum book and the books of the companies they listed. In time, each "regulation" was hollowed though. It became just window-dressing.
17
posted on
09/20/2003 9:19:58 AM PDT
by
bvw
(We're not done the war on terror until WE hold every oilfield and every strategic canal and harbor.)
To: Just mythoughts
Notice too that there is a story in today's NYPost about the TYCO investigation about to unleash the names of some VERY prominent people who were part of the fraud.
My guess is that there are more than a few people who are very afraid right now.
No doubt in my mind that there are those money market managers who will do ALL in their power to keep the stock market down to enable the evil doers to regain power.
18
posted on
09/20/2003 11:11:49 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson