Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom McClintock - The conscience of a conservative?
MensNewsDaily ^ | Sept. 19, 2003 | Bob Chandra

Posted on 09/19/2003 8:56:57 PM PDT by FairOpinion

In recent days, Tom McClintock, the "other Republican" in California's recall race, has accepted a million dollars spent on his behalf by a left-wing special interest group. He has claimed that a Democrat victory in the recall election would be desirable, as it would better his chances in 2006. And he has joined with Democrat Cruz Bustamante in a boycott against fellow Republican, Arnold Schwarzenegger. This is the man we're supposed to believe represents the conscience of conservatism? At the end of the day, Tom McClintock's Faustian Pact with the Left has made one thing clear - it's all about Tom McClintock.

The $1 million to be spent on McClintock's behalf is by Indian gambling interests, a staunch Democratic special interest. I wrote about the possibility of left-wing special interests backing McClintock in order to divide Republicans several weeks back. Now it is a reality. The Sacramento Bee has announced that the Morongo tribe is spending $1 million to boost McClintock's candidacy and it's not because they want him to win. The money spent on McClintock is meant to split the Republican vote so their loyal servant, Democrat Cruz Bustamante, can emerge the winner. With enough left- wing money, McClintock can steal enough votes from Arnold to make that happen. Tom's win-at-any-cost mindset has him collaborating with leftist groups who want nothing more than a divided Right to throw the election to Bustamante. Does McClintock see that the Left is using him? Maybe there's a reason it's called "blind" ambition.

McClintock's partnership with the liberal special interests raises serious questions about his loyalty to the GOP. McClintock has said he puts his personal "principles" before the party. But there's a deeper reason McClintock doesn't care that his spoiler candidacy will doom Republicans in the recall race.

In a conversation with US Congressman Dan Burton, Tom McClintock said the following: he (McClintock) didn't mind it if Democrats win the gubernatorial race because it could improve his own chances in 2006. According to the Los Angeles Times, "Burton, one of the more conservative members of Congress, also said McClintock had seemed to suggest that it would be acceptable for a Democrat to hold the governor's office, because he might create a clamor for a Republican in 2006.". So that's what this is really about. If McClintock can't win, he can at least prevent the Republicans from winning so he has a better shot in 2006. Aren't we glad he's playing for our team?

McClintock is now collaborating with Cruz Bustamante to boycott the California Broadcasters Association's debate on the 24th as a means of showing up Arnold Schwarzenegger. Bustamante led the boycott charge on October 17th with McClintock soon followed his lead. When you see a Republican siding with a Democrat against a fellow Republican, you know something is wrong with the picture. Don't adjust your set- this is Tom McClintock, the self-styled conscience of conservatism.

As if things couldn't get any worse, McClintock is justifying his candidacy on a poll strategically conducted by the left-wing Los Angeles Times, which wants nothing more than to keep him in the race. That Times' poll has been debunked by Field and even invalidated by the Times' own reporting. It added 6% more self-identified conservatives than other polls and naturally gave McClintock an artificial 5% bump. But McClintock is clinging to this cooked poll, another leftist ploy, because it serves his interests.

What kind of a conservative lets left-wing interests drive his candidacy like this? The answer is a candidate who is so blind with ambition that he does not see how the Left is using him to their own ends. Thus far, McClintock has claimed he stands for principle, but it is obvious that his hopeless candidacy is based on personal ambition. It's no longer appropriate to view McClintock as merely a misguided crusader. He is a bigger threat to Republican victory on Election Day than Cruz Bustamante. Up until now, McClintock has responded to arguments for stepping aside with denial, delusion, and arrogance. Given his collaboration with the Left, Republicans must get serious with him. McClintock's "stalking horse" candidacy must come to an end.


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: bustamante; california; contribution; indian; mcclintock; recall; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-295 last
To: Godebert
The landscape is littered with Arnold's casualties, so a little friendly fire is to be expected. :)
281 posted on 09/20/2003 3:34:33 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Well, it was a ``trial balloon'' that didn't work out. Now that they've got that out of the way, they can worry about repealing Prop 13 later.
282 posted on 09/20/2003 3:49:24 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
I hear you.
I get it.
They don't.
Enough is enough... let them do what they threaten... leave...

Who needs em anyway?
Bush won without their votes last presidential... with all the crossovers from the middle class middle road conservatives... of both parties... we will win again.

adios righty tighties!
283 posted on 09/20/2003 4:28:30 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (robert the rino...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
Arnold Schwarzenegger is the most conservative candidate who can win.

That's who I am supporting and why, in one sentence.

Dan
284 posted on 09/20/2003 4:30:42 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

Comment #285 Removed by Moderator

To: EternalVigilance
YOU, as a keyes chairman at the time, may have had the presence of mind to vote for Bush. But most of your keyesnian friends around here did NOT. They bragged about their intention to NOT vote, as is their right... I might add that lots of them who were vocal about opposing President Bush, calling him a baby killer, were banned en masse...

Keyes as a whole is seen by lots of us "conservatives" as a betrayor of the republican party and is truly now experiencing his very own joyful wilderness experience.
286 posted on 09/20/2003 4:53:02 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (robert the rino...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
"Arnold Schwarzenegger is the most conservative candidate who can win."

No, he's the liberal whom you prefer over the other liberal, Bustamante. And the reason you (and others) prefer that particular liberal is that he's got an "R" after his name. There's nothing remotely "conservative" about Schwarzenegger.

287 posted on 09/20/2003 5:02:22 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
If that's your sincere opinion, you have a personal problem I can't help. It isn't unavailability of facts, nor clarity of issues. It's that an unteachable person is... well, unteachable. And it looks like that's you.

Dan
288 posted on 09/20/2003 5:08:28 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Tribes Have Become Players in Sacramento
289 posted on 09/20/2003 7:24:40 PM PDT by Kay Soze (If punch card voting is not legal than Davis is not the Gov and Gore did not win California!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Characterizing me as "unteachable" and beset with "personal problems" is not an argument. It's an evasion.
290 posted on 09/20/2003 8:30:52 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat; ninenot; ElkGroveDan; Canticle_of_Deborah; Saundra Duffy; Reagan Man; ...
You guys have no issues. That is the point of #14 to which you purport to respond. That some casino-owning Indian tribe spent some money to favor McClintock (who had for some years supported Indian causes in the State Senate) is their business. The Arnie paranoids see as off the subject anything not done in service to their collapsing candidate who refuses non-scripted debates, refuses discussion of issues and to the extent that positions have been pulled out of him, indicates his near identical positions on issues that matter with Bustamante and Doofus: abortion, lavender marriage subsidized by taxpayers; lavender adoptions of innocent children, tax hikes, spending hikes, gun control, opposition to Prop. 54 which would defang the racial quota racket by removing its tools, etc., etc. His association with the likes of Riordan, Wilson, Buffett and RFK, Jr., lead one to conclude show me Arnie's friends and I'll tell you what he is.

Meanwhile, the mesmerized Arnieites wander the landscape mumbling the mantra: Only Arnie can win! Only Arnie can win! Only Arnie can WIN!!!!" Totally bereft of legitimate public policy issues to justify this duplicitous clown as governor of California, you are now reduced 1) to calling "Only Arnie can WIN!!!!" an issue which it is not and will never be and 2) berating people who are actual conservatives for not wandering the landscape chanting: "Only Arnie can win!. Only Arnie can win. Only Arnie can WIN!!!! By damn why don't you care that only Arnie can WIN!!!!!??????"

Because there is not a dime's worth of difference on things that matter among ArnieCruzaDoofus. On social issues, they are three of a kind. On taxing and spending, they are three of a kind. No Republican worthy of the name and no conservative worthy of the name is gulled for one nanosecond into believing the rank nonsense that Arnie is actually a Republican much less an actual conservative. California uis going to continue its suffering unless and until it elects McClintock or someone like him. THAT is the issue at hand. You control your end of the argument and I'll control mine.

291 posted on 09/20/2003 9:36:36 PM PDT by BlackElk (Schwarzenegger is as Republican as his wife's Uncle Teddy or as Henry Waxman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
Libertarians already have (a thoroughly impotent) party. Go back to it.
292 posted on 09/20/2003 9:38:55 PM PDT by BlackElk (Schwarzenegger is as Republican as his wife's Uncle Teddy or as Henry Waxman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
Only Arnie can WIN!!!!

Bump

293 posted on 09/20/2003 11:42:15 PM PDT by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
"Only Arnie can win."

They're terrified of a Governor Bustamante. And I know why. He'll take a wrecking ball to the state of California, driving it down far further than it already is. This frightens them. So they vote for a liberal Republican who won't have the stones to stop the taxing and spending, rationalizing that it's at least better than the alternative.

Conservatives like me don't think that way. If California under Bustamante becomes a depression-ridden war zone, then so be it. If Californians make themselves a bed of liberalism, let them sleep in it. I will never vote for a liberal and that's precisely what Schwarzenegger is.

The difference between me and the accomodationists is that I don't blink. And I know you don't either. If there were more of us in the Republican party, Bush would have no choice but to let Karl Rove "spend more time with his family" and let the US Army spend more time on our border.

294 posted on 09/21/2003 12:08:07 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
Nope. Observation. My argument is public, and easily available.
295 posted on 09/21/2003 7:16:27 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-295 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson