Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: netmilsmom
thanks, i'd have to say this one was a pretty wimpy hurricane. Fran and Floyd were much worse as was Hugo.
424 posted on 09/22/2003 11:31:17 AM PDT by holdmuhbeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies ]


To: holdmuhbeer
Same impression I had.

It's a lot worse in other places, though.
My relatives from Petersburg came to stay with my parents here in Rocky Mount; they have been told not to expect power for at least one week.

426 posted on 09/22/2003 11:36:29 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies ]

To: holdmuhbeer
thanks, i'd have to say this one was a pretty wimpy hurricane. Fran and Floyd were much worse as was Hugo.

Three things about Isabel -

1 - the windfield was extremely large - you had tropical-storm force winds several hundred miles out from the center.

2 - because of that size, you had a very large fetch with which to generate waves, and

3 - the alignment of the storm at landfall drove a lot of water up the Chesapeake, causing saltwater flooding a considerable distance away from landfall.

So, yes, if you look at the damage around where the storm made landfall, it wasn't that powerful. But if you look at the total affected area, this storm was bad - six million people lost power during the course of the storm.

427 posted on 09/22/2003 11:45:46 AM PDT by dirtboy (www.ArmorforCongress.com - because lawyers with a clue are rarer than truth-telling Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson