Bill and Hill are not running Dubya and Clark are.
Farah didn't vote for Dubya the first time and now seems enamored of Clark.
Farah sucks. Clark sucks. Dubya will crush Clark, because the rats will not vote for Clark. The Iraq war is ripping the rat party in two because the rats don't like hawks.
Clinton Dukakis Mondale Carter McGovern Humphry
Rat warriors have run before but they have not won the nomination in modern times. That is why Vietnam vet Sen John Kerry and Vietnam vet Sen Bob Kerrey got there hats handed to them by a basketball player as the only competition to Gore in 2000. Do you remember Gore and Bradley fighting for votes by promising the most homos in the military? You have to go back to Kennedy's "sexed up" military record to find a successful rat Hawk.
Clark is a joke. He is the flavor of the week that none of the rats has tried yet.
What must be done to complete a great victory Can anything be more moving than the joyous throngs swarming the streets of Baghdad? Memories of the fall of the Berlin Wall, and the defeat of Milosevic in Belgrade flood back. Statues and images of Saddam are smashed and defiled. Liberation is at hand. Liberation — the powerful balm that justifies painful sacrifice, erases lingering doubt and reinforces bold actions. Already the scent of victory is in the air.
I may agree with some of what Clark has written here but I will never vote for a rat. The rats will not agree with Clark's already stated opinions and do not think that Dean or Kerry will not inform the rats. The rats will not vote for Clark. Every rat except Lieberman has distanced himself from the Iraq war. There is a reason why they are doing this. It is because they want to win the nomination and unfortunately for Clark he needs to win the nomination before he can run against Dubya in the general election.
They'll take him over W, that's for sure.
If your point is that they won't nominate him, don't be so sure. They'll nominate whoever they think will get the swing vote. And they do seem to appreciate his sense of presence. Consider this little contribution from an irresolutely anti-military cartoonist:
Your numerous points run over my head, and I must say I don't think you read the article in question.
The article, "Why Wesley Clark is Dangerous?" Farah tries to scare America about the dangers of General Clark's potential candidacy?