[Princeliberty]

The only reason no other polls has shown Tom at 18
yet is the Times poll was the most recent poll.
The others were all showing him rising and probably
will have that high or higher or their next releases.

In fact if you consider the way the Times poll is off
too many liberals in the survey group(they add minorties
on purpose)and too few conservatives that would
mean McClintock would be yet higher if the poll
was done correctly.

[68 grunt]

Votes are being received at record rates. The election is underway. Vote confidently in a man for all the people and vote Schwarzenegger.

[RonDog]

The only reason no other polls has shown Tom
at 18 yet is the Times poll was the most recent poll.

Perhaps.

Or it could be that FRAUD thing. :o)

See also:

Los Angeles Times Caught Faking Its Pro-Democrat 'Poll'
NewsMax.com ^ | 9/17/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 09/17/2003 9:38 AM PDT by kattracks

The pro-Democrat Los Angeles Times has once again been busted for faking a "poll," this time by stacking it with blacks.

"Why did the size of the unreported racial/ethnic subgroups in the latest Times Poll amount to 18%, when according to its own exit poll, blacks and Asian voters combined comprised just 10% of all voters in the last general election?" the rival Field Poll wonders.

Slate.com notes that Field makes "a powerful case" for the Times' having "wildly oversampled non-white non-Latinos" and observes, "The Times hides this flaw by failing to even report the black and Asian subgroups separately."

The excessively large number of black surveyed accounts for the bias, Field concludes, because Orientals "historically tend to be more divided in their voting preferences on partisan matters."

CLICK HERE for the rest of that thread