Well, why don't you read this and tell us, if you really want to still be a McClintock voter.
===
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/985257/posts Bustamante, McClintock (team up) threaten to quit debate (joint letter demanding rules be changed)
Aides to Democratic Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante and Republican state Sen. Tom McClintock said they agreed to send jointly a letter to the California Broadcasters Association asking for the format change.
(even Arianna and Camejo didn't agree to sign it)
====
And:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/985238/posts A Phone Call in Need of Instant Replay (Sen. Burton calls McClintock -- what really happened)
Burton, one of the more conservative members of Congress, also said McClintock had seemed to suggest that it would be acceptable for a Democrat to hold the governor's office, because he might create a clamor for a Republican in 2006.
"Well, why don't you read this and tell us, if you really want to still be a McClintock voter."
Ok, I read it and they want an UNSCRIPTED debate not one with prior Written questions. What's wrong with that? That's the entire crux of their demand.
Arnold should be willing to answer inpromptu questions. The others are willing, why shouldn't he? Is it because he can't answer without script writers or answering off the top of his head will reveal his liberalism?
And, please, don't ask me to blindly follow another politician's opinion. I believe Mc is the only conservative in the race and I will vote accordingly.
Arnold CANNOT win w/o our delusional votes (that's what some of your pals have called us) and I raise my glass to political delusion because we can see clearly behind all the smoke & mirrors put out by Arnold's people.
And yes, I am still voting for McClintock.