[alloysteel]

Dittos on the liberal hypocrisy take on the situation. Caucasians, particularly of Northern European origin, have gotten some pretty bad press since, oh, about the end of the Second World War. They are all supposed to be archetypical Nazis, predisposed to enslaving the lesser people on the planet. In a strict accounting of origins, "Caucasians" include all of Northern Europe, (with the possible exception of a few Laplanders), the Middle East, the Indian sub-continent, the entire Mediterranean Basin (Greeks, Egyptians, Arabs, Hebrews, Italians, Spaniards and Turks), and probably a couple of the Native American tribes as well.

The melting pot was supposed to level out all the differences, yet somehow the non-Caucasians seem to feel they will be contaminated (and certainly threatened) by too close a association with the seemingly more ambitious and aggressive Anglos and other Nord-Europa tribes. All their imagined shortcomings and inadequacies appear to be magnified, and they do not like what appears to be an implicit criticism.

To the non-Caucasian, the Aryan types DO appear to be supermen. They do not recognize that the Anglos suffer from all the same doubts and fears that the "rainbow people" do.

[TLI]

To the non-Caucasian, the Aryan types DO appear to be supermen.

We are good, but we aint THAT good...

They do not recognize that the Anglos suffer from all the same doubts and fears that the "rainbow people" do.

We do? Since when? Or is it just you?

TLI