Funny stuff, this coming from the czar of propaganda.
He also accused them of risking youngsters lives in the deal.
I'm proud. He didn't forget to throw ou tthe "its for the children" argument.
I've often wondered why this is, especially for conservatives. They want to say it will open a 'floodgate'. huh? Who do you think runs this place??? We The People.
Why have the conservatives who see the fallacy of treating marijuana and meth as, basically, one in the same kept so quiet???? Why do conservatives and my beloved brothers and sisters in Christ fear mere discussion of this issue so much?? I may enjoy A mixed drink once in a blue moon... it taste good and sure can take the edge off. If I enjoyed smoking A joint once in a blue moon am I suddenly one to be crushed under your heel??
I'm stunned ... I can't wait to hear the FR Holy Warriors weigh in on that!
ASKED WHAT FORM the debate would take and how the White House would kick start the process, Waltersusually a polished, intelligent advocate for his positionwent into duck-and-cover mode. He blamed marijuana advocates and their financial backers like billionaire George Soros, who supported last years failed legalization initiative in Nevada, for stifling debate and for preventing clear information from reaching the American public.
Bobbing and weaving, and dropping George Soros' name: Hey Dane - are you really the Drug Czar?
He also accused them of risking youngsters lives in the deal.
"For the children". How rich.
Walters had nothing to say about the estimated 700,000 Americans sitting in state and federal prisons on marijuana charges or about the more than 700,000 Americans arrested each year because of poteach of whose lives and well-being is at risk for partaking of a substance that millions in this country (and a country to the north) have accepted as not being the Demon Weed the feds claim it to be.
That, of course, is the REAL issue, and it's the primary danger to "the children" and everyone else.
1) Smoking is bad -- (the only moral judgment they are capable of making) and
2) Smoking marijuana is good.
Which leads to an overwhelming question: If small amounts of marijuana were put in cigarettes, would it be OK to smoke in bars again?
1) Smoking is bad -- (the only moral judgment they are capable of making) and
2) Smoking marijuana is good.
Which leads to an overwhelming question: If small amounts of marijuana were put in cigarettes, would it be OK to smoke in bars again?