Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/18/2003 6:58:11 AM PDT by MrLeRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: *Wod_list; jmc813
Wod_list (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/involved?group=124) ping
2 posted on 09/18/2003 6:58:43 AM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrLeRoy
Poor Johnny, really stepped in it that time, didn't he?
4 posted on 09/18/2003 7:08:57 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrLeRoy
Where in the Constitution are federal agents given the authority to campaign for a particular side in State elections?
5 posted on 09/18/2003 7:13:49 AM PDT by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrLeRoy
He blamed marijuana advocates and their financial backers like billionaire George Soros, who supported last year’s failed legalization initiative in Nevada, for stifling debate and for preventing “clear information” from reaching the American public.

Funny stuff, this coming from the czar of propaganda.

He also accused them of risking youngsters’ lives in the deal.

I'm proud. He didn't forget to throw ou tthe "its for the children" argument.

6 posted on 09/18/2003 7:15:02 AM PDT by HurkinMcGurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfie; vin-one; WindMinstrel; philman_36; Beach_Babe; jenny65; AUgrad; Xenalyte; Bill D. Berger; ..
WOD Ping
19 posted on 09/18/2003 8:20:00 AM PDT by jmc813 (Check out the FR Big Brother 4 thread! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/943368/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrLeRoy
"Rarely have they acknowledged that millions of Americans actually like pot and use it responsibly, let alone that there might be a need for a national debate on how America should treat marijuana under the law."

I've often wondered why this is, especially for conservatives. They want to say it will open a 'floodgate'. huh? Who do you think runs this place??? We The People.

Why have the conservatives who see the fallacy of treating marijuana and meth as, basically, one in the same kept so quiet???? Why do conservatives and my beloved brothers and sisters in Christ fear mere discussion of this issue so much?? I may enjoy A mixed drink once in a blue moon... it taste good and sure can take the edge off. If I enjoyed smoking A joint once in a blue moon am I suddenly one to be crushed under your heel??

28 posted on 09/18/2003 9:38:45 AM PDT by sweet_diane (Philippians 4:12-13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrLeRoy; Dane
“The real issue is should we legalize marijuana,” Walters said. “Let’s have a debate about that.”

I'm stunned ... I can't wait to hear the FR Holy Warriors weigh in on that!

ASKED WHAT FORM the debate would take and how the White House would kick start the process, Walters—usually a polished, intelligent advocate for his position—went into duck-and-cover mode. He blamed marijuana advocates and their financial backers like billionaire George Soros, who supported last year’s failed legalization initiative in Nevada, for stifling debate and for preventing “clear information” from reaching the American public.

Bobbing and weaving, and dropping George Soros' name: Hey Dane - are you really the Drug Czar?

He also accused them of risking youngsters’ lives in the deal.

"For the children". How rich.

Walters had nothing to say about the estimated 700,000 Americans sitting in state and federal prisons on marijuana charges or about the more than 700,000 Americans arrested each year because of pot—each of whose lives and well-being is at risk for partaking of a substance that millions in this country (and a country to the north) have accepted as not being the Demon Weed the feds claim it to be.

That, of course, is the REAL issue, and it's the primary danger to "the children" and everyone else.

38 posted on 09/18/2003 2:03:47 PM PDT by bassmaner (Let's take back the word "liberal" from the commies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrLeRoy
Just one more example of a Federal Bureaucrat doing his best to stiffle the will of the people.
62 posted on 09/21/2003 7:48:30 AM PDT by bimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrLeRoy
How do liberals reconcile these conflicting positions:

1) Smoking is bad -- (the only moral judgment they are capable of making) and

2) Smoking marijuana is good.

Which leads to an overwhelming question: If small amounts of marijuana were put in cigarettes, would it be OK to smoke in bars again?

68 posted on 09/22/2003 8:42:56 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrLeRoy; All
How do liberals reconcile these conflicting positions:

1) Smoking is bad -- (the only moral judgment they are capable of making) and

2) Smoking marijuana is good.

Which leads to an overwhelming question: If small amounts of marijuana were put in cigarettes, would it be OK to smoke in bars again?

69 posted on 09/22/2003 8:43:54 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrLeRoy
In this age of terrorism and being so close to the Canadian border, Walters is right, Seattle should spend MORE money and resources on a plant. I'm glad to see that the "rocket scientists" are doing the thinking in D.C.
74 posted on 09/22/2003 9:16:18 AM PDT by realpatriot71 (legalize freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson