Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

D.C. Bud?
Seattle Weekly ^ | September 17, 2003 | Philip Dawdy

Posted on 09/18/2003 6:58:11 AM PDT by MrLeRoy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

1 posted on 09/18/2003 6:58:11 AM PDT by MrLeRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Wod_list; jmc813
Wod_list (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/involved?group=124) ping
2 posted on 09/18/2003 6:58:43 AM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
Fing Hippies!!! Its for the CHILDREN!!! THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!
3 posted on 09/18/2003 7:06:26 AM PDT by toothless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
Poor Johnny, really stepped in it that time, didn't he?
4 posted on 09/18/2003 7:08:57 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
Where in the Constitution are federal agents given the authority to campaign for a particular side in State elections?
5 posted on 09/18/2003 7:13:49 AM PDT by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
He blamed marijuana advocates and their financial backers like billionaire George Soros, who supported last year’s failed legalization initiative in Nevada, for stifling debate and for preventing “clear information” from reaching the American public.

Funny stuff, this coming from the czar of propaganda.

He also accused them of risking youngsters’ lives in the deal.

I'm proud. He didn't forget to throw ou tthe "its for the children" argument.

6 posted on 09/18/2003 7:15:02 AM PDT by HurkinMcGurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
According to the Drug Czar's office, its his job to speak out against drugs, so this is ok. If it just happens to be in the weeks before a coming vote, as in Seattle, Nevada, etc., and he just happens to campaign against an initiative, well that's just coincidence.
7 posted on 09/18/2003 7:17:24 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: toothless
Its for the CHILDREN!!! THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!

Did you forget your (/sarcasm)tag? The "children" can get it now on practically any street corner. If legalized, taxed and controlled like hard liquor is (at least in Texas, where hard liquor is sold only in liquor stores and you have to be 21 to walk in the door), it would not be any more available to kids than it is now, possibly even less available. Sure, you will still have irresponsible adults purchasing it for resale to minors, but you have that problem now, which negates that argument.

8 posted on 09/18/2003 7:18:01 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
Did you forget your (/sarcasm)tag?

Yes, he did. But since it provided an opportunity to debunk that argument, I for one am willing to forgive him.

9 posted on 09/18/2003 7:20:58 AM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy; ravingnutter; toothless
I think "For The Children!" has entered the hallowed halls where no sarcasm tag is required. Its self-evident. ;)
10 posted on 09/18/2003 7:22:18 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
Good article. The feds better watch out what they wish for.
11 posted on 09/18/2003 7:22:49 AM PDT by corkoman (did someone say cheese?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HurkinMcGurkin
'He blamed marijuana advocates and their financial backers like billionaire George Soros, who supported last year’s failed legalization initiative in Nevada, for stifling debate and for preventing “clear information” from reaching the American public.'

How does vigorously arguing one side of an argument stifle or prevent the other side from reaching the public? Do the stupid "pot makes you shoot your friends" ads stifle debate and for prevent clear information from reaching the American public?

12 posted on 09/18/2003 7:23:37 AM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
Where in the Constitution are federal agents given the authority to campaign for a particular side in State elections?

Better yet, where in the Constitution does it give the feds the power to make any drug illegal? When they made alcohol illegal it required a constitutional amendment. I guess we're all too enlightened now for actually following the supreme law of the land, the Constitution.

I'd also like to see the part of the Constitution that authorizes his job and the power that goes with it.

13 posted on 09/18/2003 7:24:03 AM PDT by Orangedog (Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
and for prevent --> and prevent
14 posted on 09/18/2003 7:24:19 AM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
I'd also like to see the part of the Constitution that authorizes his job and the power that goes with it.

It's in the classified part.

15 posted on 09/18/2003 7:25:12 AM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
C'mon, get serious, every school child knows the part of the Constitution where it authorizes the President to appoint Czars to direct American lives.

Look it up...I think it's section Catch 22.
16 posted on 09/18/2003 7:31:12 AM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
It's clear the power for prohibiting drugs comes from stretching the interstate commerce clause well beyond the breaking point. The thing that gets me, however, is the that "ensuring domestic tranquility" clause seems to imply that the government should be handing drugs out (or, forcibly drugging people), not trying to suppress drugs. "You! Citizen! You are not tranquil! Here, smoke some of this! It's my sworn duty to ensure your tranquility!!"
17 posted on 09/18/2003 7:31:48 AM PDT by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
Sorry, I thought the !!! and THE CAPS made a sarcasm tag redundant!!!

:)
18 posted on 09/18/2003 7:40:29 AM PDT by toothless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie; vin-one; WindMinstrel; philman_36; Beach_Babe; jenny65; AUgrad; Xenalyte; Bill D. Berger; ..
WOD Ping
19 posted on 09/18/2003 8:20:00 AM PDT by jmc813 (Check out the FR Big Brother 4 thread! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/943368/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
exactly what I have been saying for years,

but even more to your point, kids get beer and wine easily here in VA.
Mainly because it is sold at just about any store,
you very seldom see kids with the hard stuff, because it is sold at ABC stores
20 posted on 09/18/2003 8:42:09 AM PDT by vin-one (I wish i had something clever to put in this tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson