Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MIRANT EXEMPT FROM CONTRACTS, JUDGE RULES
The Fort Worth Star-Telegram ^ | 18 September 2003 | Dan Piller

Posted on 09/18/2003 4:34:01 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

FORT WORTH - U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Lynn of Fort Worth denied federal regulators the power to force bankrupt Mirant Corp. to honor discounted contracts to deliver wholesale electricity to Washington, D.C., and its suburbs. The ruling Wednesday, which is without precedent, continues an injunction that prevents the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission from forcing Mirant to honor contracts to Potomac Electric Power Co.

Mirant of Atlanta, Ga., filed its bankruptcy case in Fort Worth in July and began taking steps to dissolve contracts. Potomac Electric asked energy regulators to intervene to prevent Mirant from abandoning long-term contracts to sell power for the Washington area at discounted prices. The case was considered more of a legal test than a serious threat that the lights would be turned off in the nation's capital. Mirant's attorneys had said in court that the company would continue to supply electricity to Potomac Power even if the contracts were ended. Lynn also made it clear that he did not intend to shut off the lights in the District of Columbia and the adjacent Maryland suburbs.

"FERC and Potomac Power have to consider the interests of tens of thousands of customers in the Washington, D.C., area, while Mirant and the court need only consider the needs of a few creditors," said attorney Jonathan Guy, representing Potomac. Lynn issued a temporary injunction Sept. 3, and on Wednesday extended the injunction past its expiration today. It was widely assumed by most in the courtroom, including Lynn, that the FERC and Potomac Power will appeal Lynn's ruling to either the U.S. District Court in Fort Worth or directly to the U.S. Court of Appeals.

"I wish that I could speed up this matter and take it directly to [U.S. Supreme Court] Justice Scalia," Lynn told FERC attorney Dennis Lane during the hearing. The Fort Worth judge also noted that there was no precedent for the kind of ruling he was to make, saying, "I wish there was a white-knight case that I could call on, but there isn't." After the ruling was issued late Wednesday afternoon, Lane declined to comment on the regulatory commission's plans.

The commission had argued that its regulatory jurisdiction over power generation and transmission should not be superseded by a bankruptcy judge or bankruptcy proceeding. But Lynn said that Mirant's contracts with Potomac Power were "just the tip of the iceberg" of a multitude of contracts held by the multistate power giant, and that removal of the right of a bankrupt company to abandon its contracts would amount to loss of ability to reorganize.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bankruptcy; fortworth; judgelynn; mirant
Now, if the appeal fails, Mirant will be able to negotiate contracts at market prices. They've been selling power to PEPCO for below-market prices...and it's been squeezing them. Now, they might have a chance to survive. Man, watch what happens to MIRKQ this a.m.!
1 posted on 09/18/2003 4:34:02 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
FYI. If this company survives, some individuals who made acid comments to me earlier owe me an apology. If not, I owe them one. No middle ground exists.
2 posted on 09/18/2003 4:34:59 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (God loves us all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Check this out! Who would have believed? Very interesting case and one for the history books.
3 posted on 09/18/2003 4:35:45 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (God loves us all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Did I make an acid comment to you about Mirant?
4 posted on 09/18/2003 6:21:06 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I don't think it was you. It was another...just haven't posted to him/her yet. It is unprecedented that the judge would let them out of the contracts. It will make for VERY interesting watching in the coming days.
5 posted on 09/18/2003 1:01:59 PM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (God loves us all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Companies that are in bankruptcy have the right to get out of valid contracts. There's nothing unprecedented about that. It's in the bankruptcy code.

But I agree, it will be interesting to watch.

6 posted on 09/18/2003 1:54:04 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson