Skip to comments.
Meet Tom McClintock Thursday Evening in Culver City, CA. at "ATF Night"
John W. Brantuk, Sr.; Republican Nominee for CA Assembly, District 56 ^
| September 17, 2003
| John W. Brantuk, Sr. - Candidate for CA Assembly
Posted on 09/17/2003 6:06:05 PM PDT by Mr.B.goes.to.Washington
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-324 next last
To: skeeter
They're tax-exempt.
Do you really think that's why they're giving him money? Then why are they giving even more money to Bustamante?
41
posted on
09/17/2003 6:55:31 PM PDT
by
EllaMinnow
(#213 of the 537.)
To: EggsAckley
Damn straight! I'm sick and tired of being force-fed liberal and socialist garbage in the guise of (R)nold, here in the heart of conservative cyberspace!
Take a look:
http://www.freerepublic.com/"
Adoption rights for gays... same as Davis
Willing to tax... same as Davis
Loves abortion... same as Davis
Likes illegals... same as Davis
Against 2nd Amendment rights... same as Davis
What does a conservative lose by choosing to keep Davis rather than voting for (R)nold?
(R)nold advisors include Warren Buffet, 2 Kennedys - what advice could these people give him as governor that would possibly benefit conservatives in any way whatsoever?
There's everything to gain for a conservative to choose McClintock on the ballot and no on the recall.
First, by voting McClintock, they can cast a ballot for something they actually believe in. (They don't have to live with themselves having voted for a pro-baby-murder candidate, for instance.)
Also, from a conservative point of view, CA gets an executive no worse than what it already has, doesn't risk compounding the error with either (R)nold nor Busty, and the sitting governor would be dogmeat for any credible candidate in 2006.
The show of conservative strength would make the CA GOP, and perhaps the national party and/or other state parties understand that conservativism needs to be respected if the GOP wants to win. Since this is the philosophical root of the party, it is a very reasonable demand, but it is not negotiable.
This would put conservatives in the strongest possible position, within the GOP itself AND within the electorate as a whole, to advance an articulate, competent, conservative who can win votes from the electorate by persuasion, as is the tradition of the United States of America.
This method is a proven success, at all points on the political spectrum. Those who believe in something and are able to articulate it well sway the most votes.
All selling out for 3 years of very limited executive power can do is lay the blame for California's disaster at the feet of the GOP. It's not worth it.
42
posted on
09/17/2003 6:56:41 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(It's time for Arnold supporters to go to a LIBERAL and SOCIALIST website - where they belong!)
To: South40
Crossed-eyed, no lips, and no answer when asked if he would he drop out if poll numbers showed he had no chance a week out of Oct 7.I saw it. He didn't even have the grace to say he would happily accept Schwarzenegger's endorsement (in the unlikely event he were to overtake A.S. in the polls).
He sounded very small in that exchange.
To: Mr.B.goes.to.Washington; EternalVigilance; BibChr
Did you not see this coming Mr. B?
You attracted trolls even before anyone had a chance to see this thread.
Geesh, I never would have believed that Bibchr could become so over-the-top repulsive as he has on this thread alone. EV warned me, but I didn't believe him. Sorry EV, but I bet you turned out more correct than even you had feared. < shudder >
44
posted on
09/17/2003 6:58:22 PM PDT
by
Avoiding_Sulla
(You can't see where we're going when you don't look where we've been.)
To: BunnySlippers
By the way, I hope y'all watching Arnold right now on Larry King Live RIGHT NOW. He's GREAT!I was able to see most of the last half hour. He was terrific.
To: TrueGrip
You are the one decent serious candidate in this race.Depends on how you define "decent".
I heard on the Hugh Hewitt's radio program today a report that Indian tribes who support Bustamante---and the fellow described their rapturous ads created to support him---also are making ads for McClintock. The fact that McClintock accepts this kind of thing is not what I would call "decent".
To: Avoiding_Sulla; EternalVigilance
Geesh, I never would have believed that Bibchr could become so over-the-top repulsive as he has on this thread aloneAt the very least he needs to clear his tagline. He's gone far beyond hypocrisy.
To: redlipstick
I just responded to #21 saying I heard about the Indian tribe business on the radio today. Had not seen your link yet.
Thank you for the link to the discussion of THAT travesty.
To: redlipstick
Then why are they giving even more money to Bustamante?Because he's ahead. Read the article.
49
posted on
09/17/2003 7:13:14 PM PDT
by
skeeter
(Fac ut vivas)
To: skeeter
I guess indians like paying taxes about as much as the rest of us. I haven't read past this post, so someone may have addressed your mistaken point, but I heard a guy describe the ads these same tribes (the very same tribes) have produced for Bustamante. The are full of adulation.
They are NOT making ads for McClintock because they support him.
And McClintock knows that.
To: Mr.B.goes.to.Washington
Someday Tom will be able to afford plastic surgery like Arnie. Until then, he can't win. He just ain't pretty enough. The idol worshippers in California demand that they will only get on their knees, and chant "save us", if he looks like Hercules.
51
posted on
09/17/2003 7:15:14 PM PDT
by
Russell Scott
(Without massive intervention from Heaven, America doesn't have a prayer.)
To: South40
Crossed-eyed, no lips, and no answer when asked if he would he drop out if poll numbers showed he had no chance a week out of Oct 7.He's hard on the eyes. The guy rarely blinks. Looks weird, poor thing.
52
posted on
09/17/2003 7:17:03 PM PDT
by
onyx
To: thoughtomator
Adoption rights for gays... same as Davis
Willing to tax... same as Davis
Loves abortion... same as Davis
Likes illegals... same as Davis
Against 2nd Amendment rights... same as Davis
---
The only thing the "same" here are the same SHAMELESS LIES spread thread to thread... and you know it.
53
posted on
09/17/2003 7:17:40 PM PDT
by
Tamzee
("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
To: Canticle_of_Deborah; BibChr
At the very least he needs to clear his tagline. You should be ashamed of yourself.
To: cyncooper
Was there anything illegal with the tribes' contribution to McC as there was with the one to Bustamonte?
55
posted on
09/17/2003 7:20:08 PM PDT
by
skeeter
(Fac ut vivas)
To: Russell Scott
Someday Tom will be able to afford plastic surgery like Arnie. Until then, he can't win. He just ain't pretty enough. The idol worshippers in California demand that they will only get on their knees, and chant "save us", if he looks like Hercules. Well, the image below should show you that the voting population of California will go for a candidate without regard to appearance... as you seem to believe....
56
posted on
09/17/2003 7:21:31 PM PDT
by
Registered
(Gray Davis won't be baaaaahhck)
To: cyncooper
They are NOT making ads for McClintock because they support him. And McClintock knows that Everyone knows that.
There's one reason Indian gaming supports Tom; because they are hoping doing so will help elect bustamante and they are right.
57
posted on
09/17/2003 7:21:53 PM PDT
by
South40
(Vote Mcclintock, elect bustamante)
To: El Conservador
McWampum
I like it! Another that suits him well :-)
58
posted on
09/17/2003 7:22:42 PM PDT
by
Tamzee
("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
To: EggsAckley
Ah, I see that we are not wanted here.
(read the tagline on #20)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Priceless!
59
posted on
09/17/2003 7:23:01 PM PDT
by
onyx
To: Canticle_of_Deborah
At the very least he needs to clear his tagline. He's gone far beyond hypocrisy. Yes, hypocrisy requires some assumption that the critic is purer than the one the hypocrite is criticizing. This troll's unbalanced determination to scare people who may be uncertain into abandoning principles for some unwarranted expectations (a bowl of beans in trade for that which is promised to the faithful) is stupifying. This instance bears every appearence of the mocking Jeremiah, akin to what that prophet endured in his own time. I think this is the dark one's laugh at those of us (not me) who might be inclined to see such things as a sign of impending doom -- a Jeremiad of an unGodly sort.
60
posted on
09/17/2003 7:23:05 PM PDT
by
Avoiding_Sulla
(You can't see where we're going when you don't look where we've been.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-324 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson