[muawiyah]

I read your post(s). You recommended nothing other than a total revision of the Apostles Creed and suggested that ALL Christians are adherents of it.

First off, the Apostles did not need the so-called "Apostles Creed", and not all Christians are hung up on the thing. On the other hand, there's more to Jesus than "goody-two-shoes" sorts of things ~ antinomianism dwells exclusively on that stuff, and if frustrated or ignored by real Christians they have sometimes run naked through the village streets.

[Blzbba]

I read your post(s). You recommended nothing other than a total revision of the Apostles Creed and suggested that ALL Christians are adherents of it.

I've recommended nothing and have not even mention the Creed, nor suggested that 'ALL' of anyone do anything. First off, the Apostles did not need the so-called "Apostles Creed", and not all Christians are hung up on the thing. On the other hand, there's more to Jesus than "goody-two-shoes" sorts of things ~ antinomianism dwells exclusively on that stuff, and if frustrated or ignored by real Christians they have sometimes run naked through the village streets.

There you go again, spouting off some more definitions of your pet word of the day, 'antinomianism'. I'm happy that you're familiar with the term and impressed that you spelled it correctly, but again I question why you insist on mentioning it, given the context of this thread.