Skip to comments.
Space Elevator: High Hopes, Lofty Goals
Yahoo! News ^
| 9/17/03
| Leonard David
Posted on 09/17/2003 12:42:46 PM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-126 next last
To: A Broken Glass Republican
>>>(26000 miles)*(3 feet)*(1/1000 inch)* (1.7 gm/cc) = 3067 tons. <<<
Including counterbalance, that's 40,000/26,000 *3067=4718 tons
At $10,000 per lb to orbit = $94.36 Billion
81
posted on
09/17/2003 4:37:18 PM PDT
by
MalcolmS
(Post Like A Pirate Day: Sept 19. Arrrr Matey!)
To: RightWhale
You'd eventually want something the weight of the Cheops pyramid at the ground end. I wish you hadn't said that. Now the crazies will come into the thread claiming that the pyramids were ancient anchor points for Egyptian space elevators.
Say it can be built, how does it work as an elevator? Seems like lifting anything up it would require a tremendous boost to get past the earth's gravity(basically an attached rocket) and what if something goes wrong early on the lift? The load comes crashing back due to gravity at such force as to destroy the base. Could run it as a loop, like an escalator, but now you've doubled the length, and it seems the amount of friction at the bottom wheel to pull through 44,000+ miles of loop would be huge, plus anything pliable enough to bend around the end wheels wouldn't be strong enough to hold for 22,000 miles.
To: RightWhale
The elevator they're proposing is designed for payloads of twenty tons or less. How many tons of tension on the cable would that require? By the looks of the size of that platform, it might come close to the weight of a pyramid.
84
posted on
09/17/2003 4:39:09 PM PDT
by
Brett66
To: PatrickHenry
You're thinking of Machu Picchu...
To: Diddle E. Squat
Sounds like a job for the Otis-Babel Elevator Company...
To: PatrickHenry
Now the crazies will come into the thread claiming that the pyramids were ancient anchor points for Egyptian space elevators. We don't know what was attached to the Cheops pyramid, do we. It's missing its cap. Hmm
87
posted on
09/17/2003 4:44:01 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: LibWhacker; All
88
posted on
09/17/2003 4:45:59 PM PDT
by
Brett66
To: Brett66
If this elevator idea is going to work out economically it will need to move significant mass. 20 tons is okay, but how long will it take to crawl all the way up, it's 22,000 miles, after all. A city bus is about 6-7 tons. Can't see many people waiting for the next bus unless they come every 20 minutes.
89
posted on
09/17/2003 4:48:30 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: RightWhale
Thus, the anchor could be in Nebraska, which is not near the equator, and the geosynch crossing of the cable would be near the equatorial plane 22,000 miles up. OK, I think I understand what you're saying.
So now let's look at what that means.
For this scenario to work, you're going to need the center of mass of the system to be at GEO on the equator. If we use Nebraska, the cable is going to be at a latitude of 40 degrees, more or less.
Gravity is going to want to pull the cable south, toward the equator, so that it hangs straight down. If I'm not mistaken, this will exert a combination of radially inward and out-of-plane forces on the center of mass, which will cause the orbit to change.
90
posted on
09/17/2003 4:49:39 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: r9etb
Yes, that appears to be a good picture. The cable will remain stationary, but offset from the equatorial plane with a slight arc toward the equatorial plane and being closer to the equatorial plane the higher you go.
91
posted on
09/17/2003 4:54:09 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: Normal4me; RightWhale; demlosers; Prof Engineer; BlazingArizona; ThreePuttinDude; Brett66; ...
At first I was against the space elevator idea, now I'm for it after the Columbia accident. I did talk to some people who is developing the space elevator, they will place it away from a populated area and I'm sure there will be some protections against the terrorist.
Space Ping! This is the space ping list! Let me know if you want on or off this list!
92
posted on
09/17/2003 4:55:26 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: LibWhacker
If they are so worried about space debris then why not build a space vacumn cleaner to remove all the junk? Hell if they can build a space elevator they surely could build a vacumn cleaner. ;>)
93
posted on
09/17/2003 5:00:25 PM PDT
by
slimer
(i'm mad as hell and i'm not going to take it anymore!)
To: LibWhacker
Conversations heard on the elevator:
1) "Maintenance? Yeah, I'm stuck on the 10,000th floor. Can you send someone up to help me?"
2) "Anyone got a match?" (Below sign reading, "No Smoking on Carbon Elevator, by Order of the Management")
3) "Anyone heard lately where that hurricane is headed?"
94
posted on
09/17/2003 5:03:44 PM PDT
by
Rocky
To: RightWhale
how long will it take to crawl all the way up, it's 22,000 miles Their proposal uses a magnetoplasmadynamic (MPD) engine for transit. I don't know how fast that could be and presently it's a device that hasn't been out of the lab. It's one of those "pacing items" :) that will have to be developed.
95
posted on
09/17/2003 5:07:32 PM PDT
by
Brett66
To: slimer
why not build a space vacumn cleaner to remove all the junk? It's being worked on. Something along the lines of micro-rockets that would go to each piece of junk and de-orbit them individually. One thing about low earth orbit, which is where most space junk is, all that naturally comes back to earth in a few months on its own. The problem is that we are creating space junk faster than it is disposing of itself.
96
posted on
09/17/2003 5:08:00 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: Rocky
4) Who f@rted?
I pity the poor midget that rides one of these. :)
97
posted on
09/17/2003 5:09:15 PM PDT
by
Brett66
To: B-Chan
It really looks foolproof, folks.You didn't mean to say that, did you? I'd make a comment about "famous last words" but in the case, I think the famous last words would be (It's [the ground's] coming right at us!!!"
(Not meaning to sound negative - I actually like the space elevator idea - but there are plenty of opportunities for failure here.)
98
posted on
09/17/2003 5:28:02 PM PDT
by
irv
To: LibWhacker
While I find the idea intriguing.... I dread to think what would happen if something in low earth orbit hit it....
99
posted on
09/17/2003 5:28:06 PM PDT
by
tophat9000
(The price for Tom to drop is ....Parsky goes ....let Tom have the CA party purse strings)
To: KevinDavis
Good point, however the smarty pants space admnistrators need homegrown toolbox common sense or "accidents" will continue on schedule.
i.e. 1. Shuttles, how about just not flying when it's too cold?
if we didn't fly during Jan. & Feb. guess how many shuttles we'd still have?
2. if good old freon r12 based adhesive was used on the wing foam (as per spec. design) instead of new enviro-wacko library paste, we'd still have at least one more, even though they flew in the winter.
100
posted on
09/17/2003 5:30:58 PM PDT
by
norraad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-126 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson