Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Space Elevator: High Hopes, Lofty Goals
Yahoo! News ^ | 9/17/03 | Leonard David

Posted on 09/17/2003 12:42:46 PM PDT by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 next last
To: A Broken Glass Republican
>>>(26000 miles)*(3 feet)*(1/1000 inch)* (1.7 gm/cc) = 3067 tons. <<<

Including counterbalance, that's 40,000/26,000 *3067=4718 tons

At $10,000 per lb to orbit = $94.36 Billion
81 posted on 09/17/2003 4:37:18 PM PDT by MalcolmS (Post Like A Pirate Day: Sept 19. Arrrr Matey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
You'd eventually want something the weight of the Cheops pyramid at the ground end.

I wish you hadn't said that. Now the crazies will come into the thread claiming that the pyramids were ancient anchor points for Egyptian space elevators.

82 posted on 09/17/2003 4:38:15 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

Say it can be built, how does it work as an elevator? Seems like lifting anything up it would require a tremendous boost to get past the earth's gravity(basically an attached rocket) and what if something goes wrong early on the lift? The load comes crashing back due to gravity at such force as to destroy the base. Could run it as a loop, like an escalator, but now you've doubled the length, and it seems the amount of friction at the bottom wheel to pull through 44,000+ miles of loop would be huge, plus anything pliable enough to bend around the end wheels wouldn't be strong enough to hold for 22,000 miles.
83 posted on 09/17/2003 4:38:53 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The elevator they're proposing is designed for payloads of twenty tons or less. How many tons of tension on the cable would that require? By the looks of the size of that platform, it might come close to the weight of a pyramid.
84 posted on 09/17/2003 4:39:09 PM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
You're thinking of Machu Picchu...
85 posted on 09/17/2003 4:40:14 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Sounds like a job for the Otis-Babel Elevator Company...
86 posted on 09/17/2003 4:41:11 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Now the crazies will come into the thread claiming that the pyramids were ancient anchor points for Egyptian space elevators.

We don't know what was attached to the Cheops pyramid, do we. It's missing its cap. Hmm

87 posted on 09/17/2003 4:44:01 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; All
Here's a good article from Spacereview that goes into a little more detail about their concept:

The space elevator: going up?

88 posted on 09/17/2003 4:45:59 PM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
If this elevator idea is going to work out economically it will need to move significant mass. 20 tons is okay, but how long will it take to crawl all the way up, it's 22,000 miles, after all. A city bus is about 6-7 tons. Can't see many people waiting for the next bus unless they come every 20 minutes.
89 posted on 09/17/2003 4:48:30 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Thus, the anchor could be in Nebraska, which is not near the equator, and the geosynch crossing of the cable would be near the equatorial plane 22,000 miles up.

OK, I think I understand what you're saying.

So now let's look at what that means.

For this scenario to work, you're going to need the center of mass of the system to be at GEO on the equator. If we use Nebraska, the cable is going to be at a latitude of 40 degrees, more or less.

Gravity is going to want to pull the cable south, toward the equator, so that it hangs straight down. If I'm not mistaken, this will exert a combination of radially inward and out-of-plane forces on the center of mass, which will cause the orbit to change.

90 posted on 09/17/2003 4:49:39 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Yes, that appears to be a good picture. The cable will remain stationary, but offset from the equatorial plane with a slight arc toward the equatorial plane and being closer to the equatorial plane the higher you go.
91 posted on 09/17/2003 4:54:09 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Normal4me; RightWhale; demlosers; Prof Engineer; BlazingArizona; ThreePuttinDude; Brett66; ...
At first I was against the space elevator idea, now I'm for it after the Columbia accident. I did talk to some people who is developing the space elevator, they will place it away from a populated area and I'm sure there will be some protections against the terrorist.

Space Ping! This is the space ping list! Let me know if you want on or off this list!
92 posted on 09/17/2003 4:55:26 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
If they are so worried about space debris then why not build a space vacumn cleaner to remove all the junk? Hell if they can build a space elevator they surely could build a vacumn cleaner. ;>)
93 posted on 09/17/2003 5:00:25 PM PDT by slimer (i'm mad as hell and i'm not going to take it anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Conversations heard on the elevator:

1) "Maintenance? Yeah, I'm stuck on the 10,000th floor. Can you send someone up to help me?"

2) "Anyone got a match?" (Below sign reading, "No Smoking on Carbon Elevator, by Order of the Management")

3) "Anyone heard lately where that hurricane is headed?"
94 posted on 09/17/2003 5:03:44 PM PDT by Rocky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
how long will it take to crawl all the way up, it's 22,000 miles

Their proposal uses a magnetoplasmadynamic (MPD) engine for transit. I don't know how fast that could be and presently it's a device that hasn't been out of the lab. It's one of those "pacing items" :) that will have to be developed.

95 posted on 09/17/2003 5:07:32 PM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: slimer
why not build a space vacumn cleaner to remove all the junk?

It's being worked on. Something along the lines of micro-rockets that would go to each piece of junk and de-orbit them individually. One thing about low earth orbit, which is where most space junk is, all that naturally comes back to earth in a few months on its own. The problem is that we are creating space junk faster than it is disposing of itself.

96 posted on 09/17/2003 5:08:00 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Rocky
4) Who f@rted?

I pity the poor midget that rides one of these. :)

97 posted on 09/17/2003 5:09:15 PM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
It really looks foolproof, folks.

You didn't mean to say that, did you? I'd make a comment about "famous last words" but in the case, I think the famous last words would be (It's [the ground's] coming right at us!!!"

(Not meaning to sound negative - I actually like the space elevator idea - but there are plenty of opportunities for failure here.)

98 posted on 09/17/2003 5:28:02 PM PDT by irv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
While I find the idea intriguing.... I dread to think what would happen if something in low earth orbit hit it....
99 posted on 09/17/2003 5:28:06 PM PDT by tophat9000 (The price for Tom to drop is ....Parsky goes ....let Tom have the CA party purse strings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Good point, however the smarty pants space admnistrators need homegrown toolbox common sense or "accidents" will continue on schedule.

i.e. 1. Shuttles, how about just not flying when it's too cold?

if we didn't fly during Jan. & Feb. guess how many shuttles we'd still have?

2. if good old freon r12 based adhesive was used on the wing foam (as per spec. design) instead of new enviro-wacko library paste, we'd still have at least one more, even though they flew in the winter.

100 posted on 09/17/2003 5:30:58 PM PDT by norraad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson