Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RockyMtnMan
American's can compete on a skills basis, not a wage basis.

This is why discussing economics with people in your crowd is futile. You simply don't understand what economic efficiency even means.

171 posted on 09/17/2003 10:20:08 AM PDT by Texas_Dawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]


To: Texas_Dawg
This is why discussing economics with people in your crowd is futile.

You keep saying the same thing. But you keep coming to these threads.

You have NOTHING constructive to offer, so why don't you go away?

176 posted on 09/17/2003 10:21:38 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

To: Texas_Dawg
I understand the law of comparative-advantage quite well, you just choose to ignore the need for consumers with strong buying power. Trade deficits are a good example of your "economic efficiency" statement. The value of goods acquired by China/India at a dramatically reduced rate do not translate into better value to the consumer.

Intellectual property is more valuable than the widget itself. The trade imbalance reflects this and would be higher if we counted the value of a "job".
184 posted on 09/17/2003 10:24:33 AM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson